> Bagz: why does the “cruelty lever" always need to be set at 169%. Is there EVER a case where you think a poor person might not deserve to suffer?Previous | First | 1 | Last | Next
........................................................................
SockpuppetBagz: why does the “cruelty lever" always need to be set at 169%. Is there EVER a case where you think a poor person might not deserve to suffer?
FOOD STAMPS ARE LITERALLY STALINISM!!!!
\
........................................................................
Re: Bagz: why does the “cruelty lever" always need to be set at 169%. Is there EVER a case where you think a poor person might not deserve to suffer?
Baggers think that suffering makes the poor closer to ‘god’.
This is the same philosophy that evil witch Mother Theresa believed in.
........................................................................
Re: Bagz: why does the “cruelty lever" always need to be set at 169%. Is there EVER a case where you think a poor person might not deserve to suffer?
Phew!
I had forgotten my bagger beliefs until a couple fags reminded me what they were.
Thanks!
........................................................................
Re: Bagz: why does the “cruelty lever" always need to be set at 169%. Is there EVER a case where you think a poor person might not deserve to suffer?
/
Not allowing people who can't support themselves access to unlimited free shyt on the taxpayer's dime is 'causing them to suffer'!
........................................................................
Re: Bagz: why does the “cruelty lever" always need to be set at 169%. Is there EVER a case where you think a poor person might not deserve to suffer?
wrote:
/
Not allowing people who can't support themselves access to unlimited free shyt on the taxpayer's dime is 'causing them to suffer'!
We shouldn't have laws
\
........................................................................
Re: Bagz: why does the “cruelty lever" always need to be set at 169%. Is there EVER a case where you think a poor person might not deserve to suffer?
What's especially funny is Spanky PROUDLY doesn't donate time or money to charity. Why? Because it is inefficient.
He expects to be taken seriously by the way.
........................................................................
Re: Bagz: why does the “cruelty lever" always need to be set at 169%. Is there EVER a case where you think a poor person might not deserve to suffer?
So why do liberals insist on importing millions of third world workers to take jobs from the poor, drive up housing costs and overcrowd their schools?
........................................................................
Re: Bagz: why does the “cruelty lever" always need to be set at 169%. Is there EVER a case where you think a poor person might not deserve to suffer?
Spanky just wants cheaper fast food slop from illegal labor.
........................................................................
Re: Bagz: why does the “cruelty lever" always need to be set at 169%. Is there EVER a case where you think a poor person might not deserve to suffer?
Can't afford to feed your own children?
Get sterilised.
........................................................................
SpankyRe: Bagz: why does the “cruelty lever" always need to be set at 169%. Is there EVER a case where you think a poor person might not deserve to suffer?
wrote:
So why do liberals insist on importing millions of third world workers to take jobs from the poor, drive up housing costs and overcrowd their schools?
None of those things happen.
........................................................................
SpankyRe: Bagz: why does the “cruelty lever" always need to be set at 169%. Is there EVER a case where you think a poor person might not deserve to suffer?
wrote:
Can't afford to feed your own children?
Get sterilised.
How about free birth control, free abortion on demand, and remove all incentives to have children?
........................................................................
Ron_Santo_ReduxRe: Bagz: why does the “cruelty lever" always need to be set at 169%. Is there EVER a case where you think a poor person might not deserve to suffer?
Spanky wrote:
How about free birth control, free abortion on demand, and remove all incentives to have children?
\
Tell that to the Mexicans
........................................................................
SpankyRe: Bagz: why does the “cruelty lever" always need to be set at 169%. Is there EVER a case where you think a poor person might not deserve to suffer?
Ron_Santo_Redux wrote:
\
Tell that to the Mexicans
Latina women in the US today have a much lower birthrate than white women in the 1950s. If the 1950s white woman birth rate was okay, then the modern Latina birthrate is okay.
........................................................................
Ron_Santo_ReduxRe: Bagz: why does the “cruelty lever" always need to be set at 169%. Is there EVER a case where you think a poor person might not deserve to suffer?
Spanky wrote:
Latina women in the US today have a much lower birthrate than white women in the 1950s. If the 1950s white woman birth rate was okay, then the modern Latina birthrate is okay.
Excrement.
........................................................................
SpankyRe: Bagz: why does the “cruelty lever" always need to be set at 169%. Is there EVER a case where you think a poor person might not deserve to suffer?
Ron_Santo_Redux wrote:
Excrement.
Why do you hate facts?
........................................................................
Re: Bagz: why does the “cruelty lever" always need to be set at 169%. Is there EVER a case where you think a poor person might not deserve to suffer?
Ever notice that for a Bagger, a handout is literally Satan, except of course for a billionaire, pedophile, or Trump. They can have ALL the handouts forever! And even thinking of not giving them a handout is communism or something.
........................................................................
Re: Bagz: why does the “cruelty lever" always need to be set at 169%. Is there EVER a case where you think a poor person might not deserve to suffer?
wrote:
Ever notice that for a Bagger, a handout is literally Satan, except of course for a billionaire, pedophile, or Trump. They can have ALL the handouts forever! And even thinking of not giving them a handout is communism or something.
I see our corpulent friend has dotted out after getting skooled. Again.
........................................................................
SpankyRe: Bagz: why does the “cruelty lever" always need to be set at 169%. Is there EVER a case where you think a poor person might not deserve to suffer?
wrote:
I see our corpulent friend has dotted out after getting skooled. Again.
Nah. Wasn't me.
Curious, though.
Why are you entitled to the anonymity of being a dot, but others aren't?
........................................................................
Re: Bagz: why does the “cruelty lever" always need to be set at 169%. Is there EVER a case where you think a poor person might not deserve to suffer?
Spanky wrote:
Latina women in the US today have a much lower birthrate than white women in the 1950s. If the 1950s white woman birth rate was okay, then the modern Latina birthrate is okay.
Now do Jeets and Muzzies.
........................................................................
SpankyRe: Bagz: why does the “cruelty lever" always need to be set at 169%. Is there EVER a case where you think a poor person might not deserve to suffer?
wrote:
Now do Jeets and Muzzies.
Almost certainly lower than rabbit-breeding whytes.
........................................................................
Re: Bagz: why does the “cruelty lever" always need to be set at 169%. Is there EVER a case where you think a poor person might not deserve to suffer?
Spanky wrote:
Nah. Wasn't me.
Curious, though.
Why are you entitled to the anonymity of being a dot, but others aren't?
Hey, I appreciate it dude.
........................................................................
Re: Bagz: why does the “cruelty lever" always need to be set at 169%. Is there EVER a case where you think a poor person might not deserve to suffer?
Spanky wrote:
Almost certainly lower than rabbit-breeding whytes.
Racist asshole. Falsely claims to be opposed to racism. Fuqing dishonest hypocrite scumbag fraud.
........................................................................
Re: Bagz: why does the “cruelty lever" always need to be set at 169%. Is there EVER a case where you think a poor person might not deserve to suffer?
Spanky wrote:
Almost certainly lower than rabbit-breeding whytes.
Try again.
muzz_br.png
........................................................................
SpankyRe: Bagz: why does the “cruelty lever" always need to be set at 169%. Is there EVER a case where you think a poor person might not deserve to suffer?
wrote:
Try again.
You don't even know what you are talking about. First, religion is not reported on birth certificates. As a result, you are comparing apples to oranges when comparing Muslims to whites. Second, you are using the wrong measure. CBR is not appropriate for comparison between disparate populations.
If you look at the TFR, Muslims (data from Pew, 2015) are at 2.70. Whites in the 1950s (data from CDC) were at 3.58.
Whytes breed like rabbits.
........................................................................
Re: Bagz: why does the “cruelty lever" always need to be set at 169%. Is there EVER a case where you think a poor person might not deserve to suffer?
Spanky wrote:
You don't even know what you are talking about. First, religion is not reported on birth certificates. As a result, you are comparing apples to oranges when comparing Muslims to whites. Second, you are using the wrong measure. CBR is not appropriate for comparison between disparate populations.
If you look at the TFR, Muslims (data from Pew, 2015) are at 2.70. Whites in the 1950s (data from CDC) were at 3.58.
Whytes breed like rabbits.
........................................................................
Previous | First | 1 | Last | Next