> How Florida fights to hide insurers’ finances, companies secretly sent billions to affiliated companies while claiming losses

wrote:

You're wrong as shyt.  It's not even a debate. You're just running your mouth because you're ignorant that there is an entire discipline dedicated to this very thing.  Pays very well too. DUMBFUQ.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actuarial_science

Actuarial science is the discipline that applies mathematical and statistical methods to assess risk in insurance, pension, finance, investment, psychology, medicine, and other industries and professions.

Actuaries are professionals trained in this discipline. In many countries, actuaries must demonstrate their competence by passing a series of rigorous professional examinations focused in fields such as probability and predictive analysis. According to the U.S. News & World Report, their job often has to do with using mathematics to identify risk so they can mitigate risk.

You're such an ignorant loser.

Try to find a single actuary that will guarantee the outcome of a particular parcel of land over a lifetime horizon. Make them stake their net worth on it.

It's pathetic how you try to compete with me intellectually.

You fail at the most basic things, Doug. Like reading, understanding, and comprehending what I write. Then you argue against your misunderstanding. 42 fuqing ADVAB indeed, cannon fodder.

Spanky wrote:

You're such an ignorant loser.

Try to find a single actuary that will guarantee the outcome of a particular parcel of land over a lifetime horizon. Make them stake their net worth on it.

It's pathetic how you try to compete with me intellectually.

You fail at the most basic things, Doug. Like reading, understanding, and comprehending what I write. Then you argue against your misunderstanding. 42 fuqing ADVAB indeed, cannon fodder.

You got fuqing OWNED

You didn't even know what an actuary was until I linked.

What a dumbfuq!

Now, 2 strikes and you're out! 
\



DWELLINGS!
\

Sockpuppet wrote:

I knew what one was when I was like 10 or 12.

That's why you proposed your 2 strikes and you're out rule?

Now, you're a lying dumbfuq.

Quit while your behind, idiot.

Sockpuppet wrote:

Doug, try to find a single actuary that will guarantee the outcome of a particular parcel of land over a lifetime horizon. Make them stake their net worth on it.

You're right.

Therefore... two strikes and your out.  NO DISCUSSION.

You should have stayed in High school


I have to admit... I never thought of you as a "zero tolerance" kind of guy but then again... you are stupid.

wrote:

Why are you attempting (poorly) to insert a nonsensical statement about an actuarial 'guarantee' that does not exist? It it because you're totally dishonest? Or just stupid?

Spanky's thinking goes like this:

1) No actuarial guarantee can be given to any individual.
2) Because no guarantee can exist THEN using statistical methods cannot help mitigate risk
3) It follows therefore that if a building is destroyed twice (destroyed twice?) then it should never be built again

Sockpuppet wrote:

Cry more, dumbass.

I'm not the one who claimed we can't use science to help mitigate risk.

FUQING OWNED!

All you had to do was keep your idiot mouth shut but you're so fuqing stupid you can't even do that.

Spanky wrote:

42 ASVAB Doug

Powerful come back.

YOU GOT OWNED!

YOU MADE IT WORSE BY PRETENDING YOU WEREN'T WRONG!

NOW, THE WHOLE BOARD KNOWS YOU ARE WRONG AND TOO STUPID TO SEE IT!

How embarrassing!





Doug!
\

Spanky wrote:

SpinBabySpin.gif

Admit you were wrong, or even just that you didn't explain yourself clearly and this all goes away.

But you won't do that... you're too stupid to admit fault.

That's why you remain stupid.

wrote:

ITS NOT CORRUPT WHEN WE DO IT!
\

Its not retarded when we do it!
   \