........................................................................
........................................................................
If the USPS is willing to deliver junk mail, I'm just not seeing how they can refuse to deliver ballots.
........................................................................
It's not for the postmaster to rule on. Are they refusing to fulfill their duty? Then defund them.
We can do it all online. Done and done.
........................................................................
SpankyWill be laughed out of court.
........................................................................
Really?
Was he empowered by the Judicial to rule on the legality of Trump's EO?
........................................................................
.,wrote:
If the USPS is willing to deliver junk mail, I'm just not seeing how they can refuse to deliver ballots.
ballots are sub-junk. Just like narcotics and illegal firearms - USPS could be held criminally liable as an accessory for distribution.
........................................................................
SamplesBoiSpanky wrote:
Will be laughed out of court.
And the courts will order them to find the lost ballots how? 
........................................................................
SamplesBoi wrote:
And the courts will order them to find the lost ballots how?
By the Postmaster collecting freeway trash until he finds them
........................................................................
SamplesBoiwrote:
By the Postmaster collecting freeway trash until he finds them
That's fine but it won't actually solve the problem. It just makes the government unable to ascertain who really won.
And now I will dictate who actually won.
\
........................................................................
SamplesBoi wrote:
That's fine but it won't actually solve the problem. It just makes the government unable to ascertain who really won.
And now I will dictate who actually won.
\
Such as in 2020?
........................................................................
Spanky wrote:
Will be laughed out of court.
By a judge from Trinidad?
........................................................................
DiversityAdvocateVerminSpanky wrote:
Will be laughed out of court.
Yup....
https://www.aol.com/articles/postal-pro … 56000.html
A federal judge has halted the U.S. Postal Service’s proposed changes to its mail-in ballot delivery procedures, dealing another blow to President Trump’s effort to restrict the practice he has long criticized.
laughhard.gif
........................................................................
People can get off their ass & vote in person on voting day.
They get to dr appts and the grocery store just fine, they can suck it up and appear in person on voting day.
Exceptions can be made for the truly homebound or the people out of town, but you will need to provide evidence of this inability to leave the house and proof of travels (plane tickets etc) to receive an absentee ballot. Same proof currently required to be excused from jury duty.
........................................................................
DiversityAdvocateVermin wrote:
Yup....
https://www.aol.com/articles/postal-pro … 56000.html
A federal judge has halted the U.S. Postal Service’s proposed changes to its mail-in ballot delivery procedures, dealing another blow to President Trump’s effort to restrict the practice he has long criticized.
laughhard.gif
Now it’s not a problem thanks to SCOTUS, all mail in ballots must be postmarked BY THE POST OFFICE on or before Election Day.
No mysterious boxes of non-postmarked ballots showing up days later.
........................................................................
DiversityAdvocateVermin wrote:
A federal judge has halted the U.S. Postal Service’s proposed changes to its mail-in ballot delivery procedures, dealing another blow to President Trump’s effort to restrict the practice he has long criticized.
laughhard.gif
Fine. Stop accepting ALL mail-in ballots for delivery. Get that return-to-sender machine working overtime.
........................................................................
Still waiting for evidence of mail in voting fraud. So far absolutely nothing has been provided. So what exactly are we preventing? And why can’t you guys produce any evidence of fraud?
........................................................................
wrote:
Still waiting for evidence of mail in voting fraud. So far absolutely nothing has been provided. So what exactly are we preventing? And why can’t you guys produce any evidence of fraud?
Why do the blue states REFUSE to cooperate with voter fraud investigations?
........................................................................
wrote:
Now it’s not a problem thanks to SCOTUS, all mail in ballots must be postmarked BY THE POST OFFICE on or before Election Day.
No mysterious boxes of non-postmarked ballots showing up days later.
False. Never happened
Bagger butthurt
........................................................................
wrote:
Why do the blue states REFUSE to cooperate with voter fraud investigations?
Because the GOP has failed to demonstrate there is actual evidence of fraud. It’s blatantly obvious what they intend to do with that data: disenfranchise as many voters as possible.
Show evidence in court
Get a ruling
Then you can get data.
Until that happens - fuq off
........................................................................
wrote:
Still waiting for evidence of mail in voting fraud. So far absolutely nothing has been provided. So what exactly are we preventing? And why can’t you guys produce any evidence of fraud?
Exhibit A 
Most Votes In History
........................................................................
Exhibit B
Only President in Modern History to Not Have a Presidential Library at all, after getting the most votes in history mysteriously at 3 am
........................................................................
Previous | First | 1 | Last | Next