> How Much Will Libtards Flip Out When The Supreme Court Hands Down It's Ruling On AR-15s And High Capacity Magazines?

wrote:

I think every black or Hispanic teenaper in LA needs their own fully auto AR

That's illegal.



Only for whites.

I won’t care because I’m a Democrat and have three.

And just what will the ruling say?

Sounds like this thread is a consolation fuq you to Libtards as a result of the SCOTUS decision today

wrote:

And just what will the ruling say?

Found:  "Like handguns, semi-automatic long guns, including AR-15s, are common and ordinary and not dangerous and unusual and are therefore protected for citizen's use under the Second Amendment."

SamplesBoi wrote:

Found:  "Like handguns, semi-automatic long guns, including AR-15s, are common and ordinary and not dangerous and unusual and are therefore protected for citizen's use under the Second Amendment."

AR15's are military grade weapons and not "common and ordinary and not dangerous"

Even in military bases. You know where they keep the weaponry?

In a fuqing Armory under lock and key.

Lest some dope loses his cash in a poker game and decides to take out his anger on the rest of the players

I don't think they even allow handguns in military bases

That should teach you something

wrote:

Even in military bases. You know where they keep the weaponry?

Yes, all the guns.  It has nothing to do with AR-15s.

Using the standard that the Supreme Court itself decided in the Heller case, AR-15s are common and ordinary.  Because they are.  Because they are popular.  The most popular long gun for more than 20 years running now.  That's the test.

As far as dangerous and unusual:

WhyAR15sAreNotDangerous.png

Since AR-15s are about 1/15th as dangerous as handguns and handguns are not too dangerous, obviously AR-15s are not, legally speaking, dangerous either.

You know you are going to lose this case.  Why embarrass yourself and lie to everyone here and claim that you think you the cases has a chance?  It doesn't.