........................................................................
Samples_BoiDotty Dotterson wrote:
I know you believe this, but it's simply not even close to true. People hate assholes, even righteous assholes like you.
I did not post anything racist or hateful on reddit. (and I do not do that here)
There is a huge difference between annoyingly unpopular opinions and criminal racism.
........................................................................
Dotty DottersonSamples_Boi wrote:
I did not post anything racist or hateful on reddit. (and I do not do that here)
There is a huge difference between annoyingly unpopular opinions and criminal racism.
Again, I am sure you are sincere in your belief...but I am telling you that I view your behavior in the same way as the CI incel baggers who get banned from various forums. Usually this doesn't involve "criminal racism" either. 
........................................................................
wrote:
At any given time, there are X number of posters on at one time.
At the time of posting, a roster is calculated based on how many posters are currently logged on.
Then, as those that are logged on peruse said post, there will be a line of checkboxes along the top of the post - the number of logged-in users.
Logged-in readers can check or uncheck the post. If the majority check a post, it is moved to a second board for poop posts.
I assume there are usually a balanced number of crazies, nuts, and goons around that the voting will rarely sequester posts.
Make it so, or you're all fired.
We should definitely implement that for the next 10 days.
........................................................................
Samples_Boi wrote:
Get in line. Before Spanky spends any effort on this hair brained idea, he needs to first:
1) Enhance twitter embeds (its God’s work)
2) Enhance the N dick and homotron detector and autoblocker perhaps via AI
3) Restore deleted posts from Heekee's archive
Fixxxed
........................................................................
........................................................................
Samples_BoiDotty Dotterson wrote:
Again, I am sure you are sincere in your belief...but I am telling you that I view your behavior in the same way as the CI incel baggers who get banned from various forums. Usually this doesn't involve "criminal racism" either.
False equivalence, dumbass. 
........................................................................
Dotty DottersonSamples_Boi wrote:
False equivalence, dumbass.
I do the same thing, but I do it for reasons I think are good so that means it's not the same!
\
retardo.gif
........................................................................
wrote:
At any given time, there are X number of posters on at one time.
At the time of posting, a roster is calculated based on how many posters are currently logged on.
X is a number between 0 and 2 (0<=X<=2)
Solve for T.
........................................................................
You befuddle me Ma'am!
........................................................................
Idea for board:
shutitdown2.jpg 
........................................................................
SockpuppetSamples_Boi wrote:
Most of those are coming back once you are no longer in charge. It's a matter of time.
And what you did was very immoral. Unforgivable. Taking pricessless posts down with your own (to give you cover) because you simply had to post embarassing things with your PI out.
No matter arguing though. The archives exist and someday you will not be in charge.
Nah.
........................................................................
anon user #3A web of trust model would be better than just a pure vote based system and would make it a lot harder to game.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_of_trust
........................................................................
Previous | First | 1 | 2 | Last | Next