> Pew: 83% of Americans support voter ID

wrote:

Support for the SAVE Act, especially when it's explained what is actually in the bill, is less than 50%.

the question is, will Phildo self-immolate in protest if it passes?

As far as married women: if Martha Washington shows up to vote with her drivers license and her birth certificate says Martha Wilson, just waive her on through.
At this point first names matching is close enough and 1169% better than the free for all we have now.

If Martha shows up to vote with jack shyt because she’s barely getting by and has no documents whatsoever cuz her life has been crazy lately, she’s going to be allowed to vote anyway. They just give her a provisional ballot that she fills out voluntarily and signs (affidavit) stating she is who she is, no proof needed. Vote still counts.

Only if an election is freakishly close will they have to dig out the provisional ballots & verify the info.

Everyone knoas the libs arguments about citizens getting disenfranchised is 169% lib hysteria theater they don’t believe.

Just like the fake squawking about Row v Wade abortion going back to the states and the absurd warning scenarios libs dreamed up as consequences. No back alley abortions & deaths, nobody going to jail over a miscarriage, no millions of girls/women having babies they wanted to abort. The truth is legal abortion numbers have increased since it became a state issue, an excellent outcome all around.
Libs stopped squawking about abortion, there are more than ever.

wrote:

This is a solution in search of a problem.  Voter ID does not fix anything and only makes voting more difficult. There are astronomically low incidents of voter fraud.

All false.

Your hatred of America, and election integrity, is obvious. You are a vile, disgusting, hostile enemy.

How about this?

Make it easier to get the paperwork needed. For example, by having an agent do it on your behalf.

And then give people an allowance of $1,000 per election to cover costs which would include filing fees, agent fees, travel expenses, and time lost from work.

Deal?

Sockpuppet wrote:

How about this?

Make it easier to get the paperwork needed. For example, by having an agent do it on your behalf.

And then give people an allowance of $1,000 per election to cover costs which would include filing fees, agent fees, travel expenses, and time lost from work.

Deal?

Oh ffs. It’s a few bucks. Or free & sign form, no ID needed.

wrote:

All false.

Your hatred of America, and election integrity, is obvious. You are a vile, disgusting, hostile enemy.

You’re severely mentally ill. Get some help.

wrote:

You’re severely mentally ill. Get some help.

False.

Your hatred of America, and election integrity, is obvious. You are a vile, disgusting, hostile enemy.

wrote:

Oh ffs. It’s a few bucks. Or free & sign form, no ID needed.

Its as few bucks here and few bucks there. What about people that don't have a few bucks to spare. Do they no longer get to vote? What about old people stuck in homes, do they not get to vote now because they can't get down to DMV to get an ID?

There are millions of situations where an ID requirement is onerous and the bill has zero provisions to handle those situations.

wrote:

Its as few bucks here and few bucks there. What about people that don't have a few bucks to spare. Do they no longer get to vote? What about old people stuck in homes, do they not get to vote now because they can't get down to DMV to get an ID?

There are millions of situations where an ID requirement is onerous and the bill has zero provisions to handle those situations.

People can show up to vote with nothing, just like today. They will have to sign a form that states their info and that they are legally allowed to vote.

Just like the thing you sign today if you forget your ID in a state that already checks ID.

wrote:

Somebody has never gotten a passport. I have 8 & no team of lawyers or thousands of dollars needed.
But if you can’t handle the passport process just show up, they will let u vote anyway.
It won’t make an iota of difference & they will never have to check up on your sworn affidavit because the elections are never that close in blue states.

So we should base the law on your exact, specific circumstances, experiences, knowledge, and life situation?