........................................................................
No problem. Simple, just submit a constitutional amendment to change the section of the constitution where elections are explicitly left to the states to run. Get the required votes (2/3rds of the House and Senate and 3/4ths of the state legislatures). Then you have your federalized elections.
Until that time, you can fuq right off with your federalized elections shyt.
........................................................................
No, he wants to set uniform federal standards on how they are conducted. The states will still run them.
........................................................................
Spankywrote:
No, he wants to set uniform federal standards on how they are conducted. The states will still run them.
Just like schools!
........................................................................
JurijknotpeemusMeen!
........................................................................
Spanky wrote:
Just like schools!
First we have to fix the elections. Then we can fix the schools.
........................................................................
FEDS HAVE FINAL WORD! - states run elections first, setting the times, places, and manner under Article I Section 4.
But here's the key - the same clause gives CONGRESS THE HAMMER: "but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations."
Supreme Court has said it clear - the Elections Clause lets Congress override state rules and set uniform federal standards for House and Senate elections. It's built-in backup to stop states from screwing up federal votes.
Trump pushing for clean elections nationwide? That's exactly what the Framers gave Congress power to do when states drop the ball on fraud or chaos.
Federal override exists for a reason - protect the Republic from bad state plays.
........................................................................
wrote:
FEDS HAVE FINAL WORD! - states run elections first, setting the times, places, and manner under Article I Section 4.
But here's the key - the same clause gives CONGRESS THE HAMMER: "but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations."
Supreme Court has said it clear - the Elections Clause lets Congress override state rules and set uniform federal standards for House and Senate elections. It's built-in backup to stop states from screwing up federal votes.
Trump pushing for clean elections nationwide? That's exactly what the Framers gave Congress power to do when states drop the ball on fraud or chaos.
Federal override exists for a reason - protect the Republic from bad state plays.
And yet your side has never produced a single lick of solid evidence of widespread fraud. Not a single bit. Just accusations and froth.
Pure insanity.
Congress is never going to pass such a law. Even the Bagger Senate lead said so.
........................................................................
wrote:
And yet your side has never produced a single lick of solid evidence of widespread fraud. Not a single bit. Just accusations and froth.
Pure insanity.
Congress is never going to pass such a law. Even the Bagger Senate lead said so.
It's an ongoing investigation. They just got the evidence a few days ago so give them time.
........................................................................
wrote:
It's an ongoing investigation. They just got the evidence a few days ago so give them time.
Multiple audits from multiple independent sources including Republican controlled groups found now fraud.
MULTIPLE audits. MULTIPLE court cases. MULTIPLE attempts and all have ended in abject total absolute and unequivocal failure.
But your side keeps beating away at this. This is literally the definition of insanity.
........................................................................
Spankywrote:
First we have to fix the elections. Then we can fix the schools.
Incorrect.
........................................................................
wrote:
FEDS HAVE FINAL WORD! - states run elections first, setting the times, places, and manner under Article I Section 4.
But here's the key - the same clause gives CONGRESS THE HAMMER: "but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations."
Supreme Court has said it clear - the Elections Clause lets Congress override state rules and set uniform federal standards for House and Senate elections. It's built-in backup to stop states from screwing up federal votes.
Trump pushing for clean elections nationwide? That's exactly what the Framers gave Congress power to do when states drop the ball on fraud or chaos.
Federal override exists for a reason - protect the Republic from bad state plays.
All that you post here, shows how much of a faggit the OP is.
........................................................................
wrote:
And yet your side has never produced a single lick of solid evidence of widespread fraud. Not a single bit. Just accusations and froth.
Pure insanity.
Congress is never going to pass such a law. Even the Bagger Senate lead said so.
There it is! You the prize for using the correct codeword: "widespread".
Let's not reform elections cuz there's no "widespread" fraud even though there's plenty of fraud here and there. It's OK to have some fraud. Just not "widespread" fraud!
\
........................................................................
wrote:
Multiple audits from multiple independent sources including Republican controlled groups found now fraud.
MULTIPLE audits. MULTIPLE court cases. MULTIPLE attempts and all have ended in abject total absolute and unequivocal failure.
But your side keeps beating away at this. This is literally the definition of insanity.
They think that since there's no widespread fraud that it's OK. But you don't need widespread fraud to change an election, especially when the margin is thin.
........................................................................
........................................................................
wrote:
They think that since there's no widespread fraud that it's OK. But you don't need widespread fraud to change an election, especially when the margin is thin.
Yeah you do. Because you need a LOT of people in on the fraud. And people don’t stay quiet. They will blab. And the absence of evidence is not evidence of anything.
........................................................................
wrote:
There it is! You the prize for using the correct codeword: "widespread".
Let's not reform elections cuz there's no "widespread" fraud even though there's plenty of fraud here and there. It's OK to have some fraud. Just not "widespread" fraud!
\
They only needed 6 vote precints tp steal 2020
........................................................................
SamplesBoiSpanky wrote:
Just like schools!
I guess it is agreed that this is allowed then.
........................................................................
wrote:
They only needed 6 vote precints tp steal 2020
And yet MULTIPLE audits, court cases, and reviews could not find it.
There is no fraud. It is a pure fantasy.
........................................................................
wrote:
And yet MULTIPLE audits, court cases, and reviews could not find it.
There is no fraud. It is a pure fantasy.
COURT-ORDERED FORENSICS RAISE SERIOUS QUESTIONS ABOUT 2020 VOTE TABULATORS
A Michigan court order granted investigators forensic access to a DS-200 vote tabulator — and what they say they found is explosive.
According to the investigation, a 4G wireless modem chip was discovered embedded on the motherboard. Machine tapes reportedly show modem engagement and data transmission during the count.
Investigators also point to a pattern they say deserves scrutiny:
• Counting paused late at night in multiple battleground states
• These states reportedly used similar tabulators and election software
• At the pause, Trump led
• When counting resumed, large vote spikes favored Biden
Supporters of the findings say similar anomalies have been alleged internationally where comparable systems were used.
Critics argue the claims require independent verification and broader transparency.
One thing is undeniable:
When courts authorize forensic access to voting machines, the public deserves full disclosure of what is found — and what it means.
Trust in elections depends on answers, not silence.
........................................................................
Here Comes: Panama Express!
A secret team that seized rigged voting machines in Puerto Rico has been confirmed by America's top intelligence office.
WASHINGTON, February 4th, 2026 — A secret team led by the United States Attorney in Puerto Rico that seized rigged voting machines used in recent elections on that island has turned them over to Tulsi Gabbard at the ODNI.
This blockbuster news was confirmed today by ODNI itself in a terse statement given to corporate media outlets.
I have been aware of this information since the beginning of 2025.
The voting machines contain evidence of voter fraud and manipulation — according to several national security sources who briefed me recently. These machines were not allowed to be wiped and re-programmed by the vendor, Dominion Voting Machines, after being used in elections where widespread issues were reported.
https://www.emerald.tv/p/here-comes-pan … dium=email
........................................................................
There is a pretty good book out on the subject of our recent elections
https://www.amazon.com/Stolen-Elections … B0FP5J7CS7
Page 248: "Earlier this year (2025) a very brave member of the US DOJ seized all voting machines in a certain jurisdiction in the United States and turned them over to experts in the intelligence community for a close forensic inspection of the machines for foreign-made parts and software.
As a result of his actions and other findings, the ODNI produced this recent assessment: Foreign Involvement and Supply Chain Compromise (Chinese Components in Voting Equipment)"
Page 249: Summary - "In effect, it is all but certain that every digital voting machine in the United States contains some Chinese manufactured electronics or code."
This is the exact opposite of what Federal testing and compliance agencies (EAC and CISA and others) have promised American voters for over a decade.
........................................................................
Still not seeing any evidence. Just unhinged accusations.
Accusation is not evidence.
........................................................................
wrote:
Still not seeing any evidence. Just unhinged accusations.
Accusation is not evidence.
I guess the machines they took are the evidence.
........................................................................
wrote:
I guess the machines they took are the evidence.
Which they will tamper with and make inadmissible
........................................................................
wrote:
Which they will tamper with and make inadmissible
Tampering would be hard to prove.
........................................................................
Previous | First | 1 | Last | Next