> Why should STUPID PEOPLES vote count the same as INTELLIGENT PEOPLES votes?? We should have vote weighting by IQ score.

Women shouldn't be allowed to vote

I support this or some similar form of this.

wrote:

Republicans would never win another election if we did this.

They would if it was an IQ test that used logic instead of MSM feeds and feelings.

wrote:

If someone has an IQ 50% below the general population, their vote should count as 0.50 of a person.

If someone has an IQ of 50% above the general population, their vote should count as 1.50 of a person.

What if a person is not discerning or intelligent enough to understand the difference between "peoples", "people's", and "peoples' "?

What percentage of a person should their vote count for - maybe 0.60 of a person?

What do you think, OP?

wrote:

\
how much land does rupaul own?
RuPaul himself doesn’t directly own a massive amount of land, but through his husband Georges LeBar, the couple controls an enormous ranch.

Georges LeBar’s ranch: About 60,000 acres, spanning Wyoming and South Dakota.

RuPaul has described visiting the ranch, dressing in Western wear, and enjoying the privacy it provides.

In addition to the ranch, RuPaul owns more conventional real estate:

A $13.7 million Beverly Hills mansion

A West Hollywood condo purchased in 2007

Yes. We should base it on current market value of all property owned.

Average bagger property:

CIFotoDumpRandom10907949.jpg

Value: $17,900

Spanky wrote:

High IQ is meaningfully correlated with liberal beliefs.

Pure bullshyt!

https://www.psypost.org/the-politics-of … ervatives/

Spanky wrote:

High IQ is meaningfully correlated with liberal beliefs.

You keep claiming this - can you provide a source for it?

Heinlein was right: Universal suffrage is a terrible idea.