> Fuqed a whyte whore last night

wrote:

aids.jpg

You can't get AIDS through vaginal intercourse.  There have been some cases of female-to-male transmission, but they are statistically insignificant.

Those who claim to get AIDS from a chick actually got it from getting fuqed by a dude.  These statistics are gotten largely from interviews with AIDS patients.

Negroes have a higher rate of AIDS transmission because a large portion of them are homosexuals or bisexuals (the latter is the transmission route for infecting negro women).  Heterosexual AIDS (of the female-to-male variety) is a myth concocted by homosexuals to claim that AIDS affects everyone.

AIDS is spreading in Africa like mad because negro males are "on the down low" homosexuals.

So the OP is not in any real danger of getting AIDS.

wrote:

You can't get AIDS by having sex with somebody who has AIDS
\

VAGINAL INTERCOURSE IS JUST AS DANGEROUS AS ANAL INTERCOURSE!!!! THE TV TOLD ME SO!!!!!!!
\


You're a fuqing retard who has been brainwashed by the

wrote:

I'm pretty sure sexually transmitted diseases are not transmitted through sex.
\

I'm pretty sure that fuqing pussy is just as dangerous as getting fuqed in the ass.
\

If you banged a chick hard enough, I'm sure that it could be transmitted by abrasions and lesions within the vagina.
Unless you're a manlet who hates rough sex.

wrote:

Go have sex with an AIDS victim then you won't... you know why?

Because you don't want to get AIDS.

There's a huge difference with having straight vaginal sex with a chick you picked up in a bar AND having group homo sex being the recepticle from AIDS-infected man goo from 20 people fuqing you in the ass.

Only a libfag believes that hetero vaginal intercourse is just as dangerous as homo anal sex.

wrote:

There's a huge difference with having straight vaginal sex with a chick you picked up in a bar AND having group homo sex being the recepticle from AIDS-infected man goo from 20 people fuqing you in the ass.

Only a libfag believes that hetero vaginal intercourse is just as dangerous as homo anal sex.

You can't get AIDS through vaginal intercourse.  I'm a virologist so I'm willing to bet my life on it.
\



Just kidding... I'm just a dumbfuq 14 yearold troll.

wrote:

A 1 in 25000 chance.  I bet in those cases, there were several co-factors such as bleeding and open sores caused by other STDs.

Female-to-male HIV cases are statistically insignificant.

Actually it would be 1 in 2500

wrote:

Hetero vaginal sex is more dangerous than homo anal sex.
\

Hetero sex is not as dangerous as anal sex... therefor you can't get AIDS that way.  Trust me, I'm a doctor
\

There is a bitter posting in this thread.

wrote:

Oops, a typo.  But my point still stands.  Actually, the UN came out a few years ago and quietly admitted that hetero AIDS was largely exaggerated and this myth caused a lot of waste of valuable resources.

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style … 42478.html

Libfags: check and mate.

Doctor De Cock?

Really?

Even by CI standards this is incredibly stupid.

dildo_baggins wrote:

There is a bitter posting in this thread.

I came across a libfag who argued with a straight face that hetero vaginal sex was more dangerous than homo anal sex in the 1990s while I was in university.  His hatred for heteros could be seen with his expression, awaiting with gleeful anticipation for an AIDS epidemic to wipe out the hetero population.

I'm still waiting for heteros to die off like the 's did in the 1980s...

One of the funniest threads I've seen in a long time.