........................................................................
WASHINGTON -- The Trump administration is wading into a legal fight between OpenAI and the New York Times, backing the ChatGPT-maker's argument in a closely watched case over how it builds its AI technology by ingesting and processing millions of news articles.
In court papers filed Tuesday, the Justice Department supported OpenAI's argument that training its models on troves of writings found on the internet is protected by the “fair use” doctrine of copyright law.
The Justice Department wrote that “the creative possibilities and public benefits” of training large language models on such content “far outweigh any competitive harm.”
It told the court that siding with The New York Times and other publishers who argue OpenAI's practice violates copyright law would thwart “creative and scientific progress while hindering American prosperity and economic mobility.”
The New York Times said Wednesday that the administration “is siding with a handful of trillion-dollar AI companies at the expense of the countless American creators whose work they stole.”
“Both AI and creators can thrive — AI companies simply need to pay fairly for the content that makes their products possible, as copyright law requires,” Graham James, a spokesperson for the paper, said in an emailed statement. “The Administration’s proposal to let companies take that content without permission or compensation would undermine the sustainability of the human-created content that a healthy society depends on, and which AI needs to function.”
https://abcnews.com/US/wireStory/trump- … -136153915
........................................................................
If it can be looked up in a public library it's fair use.
........................................................................
HerodotusIs the NYTimes saying that historians can't use newspapers as a source?
........................................................................
Herodotus wrote:
Is the NYTimes saying that historians can't use newspapers as a source?
AYRTS? AI is generating derivative work from copyrighted material.
........................................................................
wrote:
AYRTS? AI is generating derivative work from copyrighted material.
So what you're saying is that an "intelligent" entity reads the paper and then produces its own content?
Wow.
In other news, Gemini now refuses to summarize at least some YouTube content.
Which was handy for summarizing this video prompt to just skip all the noise and get to the point.
........................................................................
Previous | First | 1 | Last | Next