> Ever notice that the moment you ask a Bagger for evidence, they instantly resort to name calling and screeching

wrote:

Because Baggerism depends on mindlessly regurgitating right-wing media lies - not evidence, facts, and reality.

Now, call me vermin and demand I be incinerated, because you sure as shyt ain't going to post one tiny bit of evidence to prove anything.
          \
libfag.png

Evidence:

DiversityFTWBanner.gif

That is fact.

verified.png


Now stfu and get in the incinerator, faggot.

dumpsterfire2.gif

Men can actually be women and need tampons!   PROVE ME WRONG!

wrote:

I notice thats what liberals do.
Then they get pwned by reality and run off to start a new fread.

verified.png

wrote:

I notice thats what liberals do.
Then they get pwned by reality and run off to start a new fread.

How about you post evidence of election fraud in 2020. Go ahead, I will wait in this thread and you can own me.

But if you call me a name or demand I be incinerated, then we know the OP was right.

wrote:

How about you post evidence of election fraud in 2020. Go ahead, I will wait in this thread and you can own me.

But if you call me a name or demand I be incinerated, then we know the OP was right.

https://electionfraud.heritage.org/

Here is one database

wrote:

https://electionfraud.heritage.org/

Here is one database

You might want to read the analysis of that data: https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/ … cent-voter

Summary

Among the examples in the Heritage document are a case from 1948 (when Harry S. Truman beat Thomas Dewey) and a case from 1972 (when Richard Nixon defeated George McGovern). Only 105 of its 749 cases came from within the past five years.

In reviewing billions of votes cast, the Heritage Foundation identified just 10 cases involving in-person impersonation fraud at the polls (fewer than the number of members on the president’s Commission).

The database includes only 41 cases involving non-citizens registering, voting, or attempting to vote over five decades, highlighting the absurdity of President Trump’s claim that millions of non-citizens voted in the 2016 election alone.

A vast majority of fraud “examples” cited by the Heritage Foundation would not be addressed by the voter suppression laws its staff supports, including “Election Integrity” Commission member Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at Heritage. Von Spakovsky distributed copies of the database at the panel’s first meeting in July.
Many cases highlighted in the database show that existing laws and safeguards are already preventing voter fraud — the ineligible voters or individuals engaging in misconduct were discovered and prevented from casting a ballot.

Furthermore, Heritige is a right wing group and therefore the data is extremely biased.  Please cite objective evidence not political content. 

So if that is your evidence, why do we need new laws to stop fraud? Your own evidence shows it to be exceptionally rare and easily punished under existing laws.

wrote:

analysis ... brennancenter.org
brennan.png

wrote:

Evidence:

DiversityFTWBanner.gif

That is fact.

verified.png


Now stfu and get in the incinerator, faggot.

dumpsterfire2.gif

bag harder!!

wrote:

How about you post evidence of election fraud in 2020. Go ahead, I will wait in this thread and you can own me.

But if you call me a name or demand I be incinerated, then we know the OP was right.

Dont need to. Your original premise is already being disproved coldly and unemotionally.