> US attacked an Iran-bound oil tanker (civilian target). Iran responded by shooting down a US Apache attack helicopter (military target)Previous | First | 1 | Last | Next
........................................................................
US attacked an Iran-bound oil tanker (civilian target). Iran responded by shooting down a US Apache attack helicopter (military target)
Iran has a right to defend itself
-----
Indian crew airlifted from burning Iran-bound tanker struck by US jet in Gulf of Oman
Crew of unladen oil tanker reported fire on Monday afternoon and requested immediate evacuation
09 June 2026
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl … 92207.html
-----
U.S. Apache helicopter shot down by Iran, Trump says; crew rescued by sea drone
June 9, 2026
The Apache helicopter that crashed into the sea the previous day was shot down by Iran while patrolling over the Strait of Hormuz, President Trump said Tuesday, vowing to "respond to this attack."
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-apache- … ne-rescue/
........................................................................
Re: US attacked an Iran-bound oil tanker (civilian target). Iran responded by shooting down a US Apache attack helicopter (military target)
I saw an interesting youtube video about Iran's missile tech - it claimed that the Iranians had missiles capable of targeting all of the US aircraft by using infrared signatures
........................................................................
Re: US attacked an Iran-bound oil tanker (civilian target). Iran responded by shooting down a US Apache attack helicopter (military target)
AI Overview
Under the rules of armed conflict, Iranian oil freighters and tankers are considered civilian vessels. However, if they are integrated into military operations—such as being used to transport troops, weapons, or supplies for hostile state actors like the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) to fund conflict—their legal status under international law can change, making them legitimate military targets.
........................................................................
Re: US attacked an Iran-bound oil tanker (civilian target). Iran responded by shooting down a US Apache attack helicopter (military target)
wrote:
AI Overview
Under the rules of armed conflict, Iranian oil freighters and tankers are considered civilian vessels. However, if they are integrated into military operations—such as being used to transport troops, weapons, or supplies for hostile state actors like the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) to fund conflict—their legal status under international law can change, making them legitimate military targets.
\
There is ZERO evidence that the oil tanker was carrying troops & weapons.
........................................................................
Re: US attacked an Iran-bound oil tanker (civilian target). Iran responded by shooting down a US Apache attack helicopter (military target)
wrote:
There is ZERO evidence that the oil tanker was carrying troops & weapons.
There is ZERO evidence that the oil tanker was NOT carrying troops & weapons.
........................................................................
Re: US attacked an Iran-bound oil tanker (civilian target). Iran responded by shooting down a US Apache attack helicopter (military target)
wrote:
There is ZERO evidence that the oil tanker was NOT carrying troops & weapons.
\
The evacuation showed that everyone onboard was a civilian from India.
Therefore, all evidence shows that it was just an oil tanker, and a CIVILIAN target.
........................................................................
Re: US attacked an Iran-bound oil tanker (civilian target). Iran responded by shooting down a US Apache attack helicopter (military target)
wrote:
The evacuation showed that everyone onboard was a civilian from India.
Therefore, all evidence shows that it was just an oil tanker, and a CIVILIAN target.
:themoreyouknow
Evidence?
You mean what someone said?
........................................................................
Re: US attacked an Iran-bound oil tanker (civilian target). Iran responded by shooting down a US Apache attack helicopter (military target)
wrote:
Evidence?
You mean what someone said?
\
Yes, what ALL sides are reporting.
........................................................................
Phillip_McCavityRe: US attacked an Iran-bound oil tanker (civilian target). Iran responded by shooting down a US Apache attack helicopter (military target)
wrote:
There is ZERO evidence that the oil tanker was NOT carrying troops & weapons.
Actually there is quite a bit. If the tanker is on fire, you'd know soon if there are any troops or weapons on it.
........................................................................
Re: US attacked an Iran-bound oil tanker (civilian target). Iran responded by shooting down a US Apache attack helicopter (military target)
wrote:
Yes, what ALL sides are reporting.
ALL sides?
What is the US government saying? Are they saying "Yes, we bombed a civilian tanker and committed war crimes?"
ALL SIDES are saying
https://www.campidiot.com/viewtopic.php … p;n=26#n26
Spanky says " what people say is not court admissible evidence "
........................................................................
Previous | First | 1 | Last | Next