........................................................................

Democrats discuss replacing the entire Virginia State Supreme Court to restore the party's congressional redistricting plan, according to a new report in the New York Times.
The idea would involve passing a new law requiring state Supreme Court justices to retire at age 54, which would allow Democrats to replace all the current members. The new justices could then rehear the redistricting case and overturn the previous decision.
The report says Democratic leaders in Virginia had mixed reactions about the idea and haven't agreed on a plan to move forward.
U.S. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who took part in the private conversation where the idea was discussed, said they are "exploring all options" to overturn the court's decision.
Democrats are angry about Friday’s court ruling, which was a major setback for them. Progressives are demanding the party get tougher in its redistricting battle with Republicans and “fight fire with fire.” Some are even calling on Democratic leaders to ignore the court’s ruling. But the state’s Democratic leadership doesn’t seem willing to do that.
"No matter what it takes, House Democrats will win in November so we can help rescue this nation from the extremism being unleashed by Donald Trump and Republicans," Jeffries said. "Our fight is not over. We are just getting started.”
Link to the NY Times article in the comments below, along with a link to a progressive newsletter where this plan is detailed more. See less
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/10/us/p … ering.html
........................................................................
SockpuppetIt’s total warfare. Anything legal should be considered.
Baggers have done similar things. They’d do so again.
We no longer constrain ourselves by “norms.” Baggers have ignored them for a long time. Now we are too.
........................................................................
doit.gif
Baggers wouldn't think twice about it, so neither should Dems. Remember, BAGGERS started this.
........................................................................
Fire the entire VA Supreme Court because you disagree with a decision
is that before or after the dems No Kings parade?
........................................................................
wrote:
Fire the entire VA Supreme Court because you disagree with a decision
is that before or after the dems No Kings parade?
Baggers changed rules specifically to take power away from Dems, so you can fuq right off to infinity and beyond with your horseshyt outrage.
........................................................................
Sockpuppet wrote:
It’s total warfare. Anything legal should be considered.
Baggers have done similar things. They’d do so again.
We no longer constrain ourselves by “norms.” Baggers have ignored them for a long time. Now we are too.
Ya know, this sounded a lot more threatening before you lost both houses and the White House 
/
Thatart your OWN thocial media platform if you don't like it teeheeheee
/
B&
/
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE SHAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRT
........................................................................

........................................................................
Like most people I had no earthly idea that New England had 0 congressmen due to gerrymandering.
Every. Single. Seat, despite the population being 40-50% not liberals. Seems the dems have already used up their blue states. Repubs just now catching up. The southern states are just now doing what the New England states did years ago.
What was attempted in VA was taking an entire huge rural state and connecting 5 rural districts by a string into Fairfax. 5 panhandles. Very convenient, all the VA congressmen for Deep South VA could end up being neighbors in the same Fairfax HOA. Terribly inappropriate and congrats, they put a big spotlight on the issue that almost nobody knew or cared about.
........................................................................
PS I have a feeling the public WTF conference call where they floated the idea of firing their entire Supreme Court by setting a max age of 45 or whatever was somebody joking, that’s absurd. Too bad the media had to report it at face value.
Not even the dumbass new governor would sign off something that retarded.
The entire fiasco has been an education to the rest of the country what can happen in an instant to a 50-50 purple state shortly after getting a liberal governor. Not a good look libs.
........................................................................
Spankywrote:
Like most people I had no earthly idea that New England had 0 congressmen due to gerrymandering.
Every. Single. Seat, despite the population being 40-50% not liberals. Seems the dems have already used up their blue states. Repubs just now catching up. The southern states are just now doing what the New England states did years ago.
What was attempted in VA was taking an entire huge rural state and connecting 5 rural districts by a string into Fairfax. 5 panhandles. Very convenient, all the VA congressmen for Deep South VA could end up being neighbors in the same Fairfax HOA. Terribly inappropriate and congrats, they put a big spotlight on the issue that almost nobody knew or cared about.
Are you saying there are no liberals in all those red states?
CIFotoDumpRandom48837607.png
JURIMANDUHRPING!!!
\
........................................................................
Gosh forbay any red gerrymandered areas turn blue
That would be... unfortunate
\
........................................................................
Spanky wrote:
Are you saying there are no liberals in all those red states?
CIFotoDumpRandom48837607.png
JURIMANDUHRPING!!!
\
Wyoming has 1 seat
As long as the districts are not organized by the color of skin it’s OK
Perhaps dems can say they are gerrymandering based on who has chirping smoke detectors?
........................................................................
Samples_BoiWait until you hear our plans for the post Trump SCOTUS.
........................................................................
Spankywrote:
Wyoming has 1 seat
![]()
As long as the districts are not organized by the color of skin it’s OK
Perhaps dems can say they are gerrymandering based on who has chirping smoke detectors?

........................................................................
Previous | First | 1 | Last | Next