........................................................................
At any given time, there are X number of posters on at one time.
At the time of posting, a roster is calculated based on how many posters are currently logged on.
Then, as those that are logged on peruse said post, there will be a line of checkboxes along the top of the post - the number of logged-in users.
Logged-in readers can check or uncheck the post. If the majority check a post, it is moved to a second board for poop posts.
I assume there are usually a balanced number of crazies, nuts, and goons around that the voting will rarely sequester posts.
Make it so, or you're all fired.
........................................................................
And for the fake news spammer their votes wont ever count.
........................................................................
SpankyGood idea and doable. There was something like this that I wrote on FF.
Not worth the effort though as it would be a big lift and nobody would appreciate it or give a fuq.
........................................................................
Spanky wrote:
Good idea and doable. There was something like this that I wrote on FF.
Not worth the effort though as it would be a big lift and nobody would appreciate it or give a fuq.
But you can have your chat do it for you. lol
Ok then bring back Poker!
........................................................................
Spankywrote:
But you can have your chat do it for you. lol
Ok then bring back Poker!

Poker.
Fuq. Forgot about that.
The CI code is overloaded with so much shytsmell, it would take all the AI computing power in the world to fix it.
........................................................................
Samples_BoiGet in line. Before Spanky spends any effort on this hair brained idea, he needs to first:
1) Eliminate twitter embeds
2) Enhance the N word and homophobia autoblocker perhaps via AI
3) Restore deleted posts from Heekee's archive
........................................................................
Samples_Boi wrote:
Get in line. Before Spanky spends any effort on this hair brained idea, he needs to first:
1) Eliminate twitter embeds
2) Enhance the N word and homophobia autoblocker perhaps via AI
3) Restore deleted posts from Heekee's archive
kill yourself olg
........................................................................
SpankySamples_Boi wrote:
Get in line. Before Spanky spends any effort on this hair brained idea, he needs to first:
1) Eliminate twitter embeds
2) Enhance the N word and homophobia autoblocker perhaps via AI
3) Restore deleted posts from Heekee's archive
I don't think that restoring the archive would be appropriate.
Irrespective of my posts, when the board was transitioned to me hosting it the users at the time were promised two things:
1) I wouldn't see their IPs.
2) That if they wanted all of their posts wiped that they would be. Numerous users chose this option.
I'd love to have the IPs because it would make moderation easier. But it is sort of breaking of a contract.
........................................................................
Samples_BoiSpanky wrote:
I don't think that restoring the archive would be appropriate.
Irrespective of my posts, when the board was transitioned to me hosting it the users at the time were promised two things:
1) I wouldn't see their IPs.
2) That if they wanted all of their posts wiped that they would be. Numerous users chose this option.
I'd love to have the IPs because it would make moderation easier. But it is sort of breaking of a contract.
Nah. Those posts are coming back someday. You primarily deleted them for selfish reasons.
........................................................................
SpankySamples_Boi wrote:
Nah. Those posts are coming back someday. You primarily deleted them for selfish reasons.
There are four classes of posts that have been deleted:
1) the pre-2015 posts of mine that shlomo deleted for me at my request to ensure I didn't lose my job: these could still exist if there is a backup since they were wiped in a bulk operation, so depending on backup timing they might still be around
2) the post-2015 post of mine whose deletion I automated, one post at a time, long before I took over hosting: those are likely gone forever at least in terms of a single bulk restore and nobody is going to surgically stitch that all back together
3) the 2019 purge of posts from people besides me: when the board was transitioned to me for hosting, shlomo offered users the right to have their posts deleted if they so chose, and numerous people took him up on that offer; I suspect an archive backup exists of those (I would have done a backup for security purposes before handing the board over to me for hosting) - but it would be immoral to restore those posts
4) post-2019 deletions of my posts: these are never coming back for the same reasons as #2
........................................................................
Samples_BoiMost of those are coming back once you are no longer in charge. It's a matter of time.
And what you did was very immoral. Unforgivable. Taking pricessless posts down with your own (to give you cover) because you simply had to post embarassing things with your PI out.
No matter arguing though. The archives exist and someday you will not be in charge.
........................................................................
Samples_Boi wrote:
Get in line. Before Spanky spends any effort on this hair brained idea, he needs to first:
1) Eliminate twitter embeds
2) Enhance the N word and homophobia autoblocker perhaps via AI
3) Restore deleted posts from Heekee's archive
Do you ever wake up in the morning and think "You know, I don't feel like being a trite and sanctimonious bore today"?
........................................................................
Samples_Boiwrote:
Do you ever wake up in the morning and think "You know, I don't feel like being a trite and sanctimonious bore today"?
I am true to myself. 
........................................................................
.,Spanky wrote:
Good idea and doable. There was something like this that I wrote on FF.
Not worth the effort though as it would be a big lift and nobody would appreciate it or give a fuq.
I hear you - would require a lot of design, dev work, and testing. I thought about this though for social forums like Reddit. The moderation approach there has become often times insufferable. There's got to be a better way where there's some sort of half-way consensus among active users as to whether a post gets flagged/deleted.
........................................................................
Samples_Boi., wrote:
I hear you - would require a lot of design, dev work, and testing. I thought about this though for social forums like Reddit. The moderation approach there has become often times insufferable. There's got to be a better way where there's some sort of half-way consensus among active users as to whether a post gets flagged/deleted.
Slashdot had it right.
Reddit is a shytheap echochamber of delicate flowers. I've never been banned so hard as I was on reddit. One forum had to pretty much restrict all new posters because I would just clear my cookies and create a new user with each post.
........................................................................
Samples_Boi wrote:
I am true to myself.
You are the perfect example of why dry drunks hang out together...because nobody else can stand them.
........................................................................
Samples_Boiwrote:
You are the perfect example of why dry drunks hang out together...because nobody else can stand them.
Well, lets not overly generalize. You can't stand me (which also happens to be the reason why I like to post here).
........................................................................
Dotty DottersonSamples_Boi wrote:
Slashdot had it right.
Reddit is a shytheap echochamber of delicate flowers. I've never been banned so hard as I was on reddit. One forum had to pretty much restrict all new posters because I would just clear my cookies and create a new user with each post.
This is a trait you share with CI's bagger incel community: pride in being banned and your efforts to evade the same, AND insistence that the MODS are the problem, not you being a manchild.
........................................................................
Samples_Boi wrote:
Well, lets not overly generalize. You can't stand me (which also happens to be the reason why I like to post here).
Actually I like you pretty well when you are not acting like a petty like qunt.
And I know what I am talking about: you are far from unique in being both obnoxious AND a dry drunk.
........................................................................
Samples_BoiDotty Dotterson wrote:
This is a trait you share with CI's bagger incel community: pride in being banned and your efforts to evade the same, AND insistence that the MODS are the problem, not you being a manchild.
You got me all wrong. I posted views that were 169% diametrically opposed to the groupthink of a particular reddit forum.
The delicate flowers on that forum voted me down. But NevertheLess I Persisted (tm).
I would have happily continued to troll using a single account, but the flowers couldn't stand it and started reporting me for hurting feelings.
Once banned, I just created a new account.
They started banning me on sight so I simply kept creating new accounts.
Eventually without announcement they closed the forum to new users (and silently shadowbanned the poor newbies).
........................................................................
Samples_Boiwrote:
Actually I like you pretty well when you are not acting like a petty like qunt.
And I know what I am talking about: you are far from unique in being both obnoxious AND a dry drunk.
But I am a petty qunt and a dry drunk. I must be true to myself. 
........................................................................
Dotty DottersonSamples_Boi wrote:
You got me all wrong.
No even close. What I said is 100% true: you and CI bagger incels love to get attention by acting out.
........................................................................
Samples_Boi wrote:
But I am a petty qunt and a dry drunk. I must be true to myself.
I seriously know multiple dry drunks that I will avoid seeing if possible just as much as when they were drinking.
........................................................................
Samples_BoiDotty Dotterson wrote:
No even close. What I said is 100% true: you and CI bagger incels love to get attention by acting out.
The things I posted on reddit were not actually factually untrue. They were just very unpopular with a certain cohort of 21-35 year old men. I simply refused to stop posting it.
There's a huge difference between what I posted and the hateful racism that baggers spout on this board, some of which is actually illegal.
........................................................................
Dotty DottersonSamples_Boi wrote:
There's a huge difference between what I posted and the hateful racism that baggers spout on this board, some of which is actually illegal.
I know you believe this, but it's simply not even close to true. People hate assholes, even righteous assholes like you.
........................................................................
Previous | First | 1 | 2 | Last | Next