> BAGGERS: Could you please explain how Trump's tariff rollback is not a monumental fuqup of epic proportions?

FUQ THE CONSTITUTION!!! WE NEED TO LET WHITE CONSERVATIVE MEN DO ANYTHING THEY WANT WITH ABSOLUTELY NO OVERSIGHT OR ACCOUNTABILITY IN ANY WAY WHATSOEVER!!! ITS WHAT JESUS ORDERED!!!!!!
\

The Supreme Court just “helped” Trump and most people can’t see it.

They struck down tariffs based on the IEEPA law, that has been abused by past presidents, especially Obama, as I just laid out in a two part thread.

That law is so broad, that it actually endangers America, when used by a corrupt president like Obama.

And this ruling did nothing to stop Trump from imposing tariffs.

Trump immediately declared that he would restore the tariffs struck down because of the IEEPA law.

How?

NATIONAL SECURITY.

And here’s what most people are missing in this Supreme Court decision.

The Supreme Court did not give a remedy.
They didn’t demand that the tariffs be given back or how.

Why?

I would argue that they knew what was coming.
The Supreme Court did not throw out the tariffs that Trump placed on countries because of “national security.”

Why?

The Constitution gives the president “plenary power” over “national security.”

The Supreme Court knew that was coming.

They literally DISTINGUISHED what tariffs are legal and what tariffs aren’t.

That’s a great PRECEDENT for the future.
Clear law instead of purposely ambiguous law, that allows for future abuse.

Trump just exposed the corrupt IEEPA law in order to set the table to get rid of it.

wrote:

The Supreme Court just “helped” Trump and most people can’t see it.

They struck down tariffs based on the IEEPA law, that has been abused by past presidents, especially Obama, as I just laid out in a two part thread.

That law is so broad, that it actually endangers America, when used by a corrupt president like Obama.

And this ruling did nothing to stop Trump from imposing tariffs.

Trump immediately declared that he would restore the tariffs struck down because of the IEEPA law.

How?

NATIONAL SECURITY.

And here’s what most people are missing in this Supreme Court decision.

The Supreme Court did not give a remedy.
They didn’t demand that the tariffs be given back or how.

Why?

I would argue that they knew what was coming.
The Supreme Court did not throw out the tariffs that Trump placed on countries because of “national security.”

Why?

The Constitution gives the president “plenary power” over “national security.”

The Supreme Court knew that was coming.

They literally DISTINGUISHED what tariffs are legal and what tariffs aren’t.

That’s a great PRECEDENT for the future.
Clear law instead of purposely ambiguous law, that allows for future abuse.

Trump just exposed the corrupt IEEPA law in order to set the table to get rid of it.

Hey, you got some shyt on your nose where you stuck it up Trump's ass.

wrote:

Think about the huge cost of implementing the tariffs. Not just the dollar cost of paying them, but also the costs associated with negotiating the deals with all the individual countries, the cost of administering them, etc.

Now there will be more costs to roll them back.

Not to mention all of the uncertainty surrounding future tariff actions - Trump now says he will push for 10% tariffs across the board.

Why did Trump choose to move forward on them when he sould have known that he had no legal basis?

This is what John Roberts said: "“The fact that no President has ever found such power in IEEPA is strong evidence that it does not exist,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority. In their opinion, the justices noted the Constitution “very clearly” gives Congress, not the president, the power to impose taxes, including tariffs.

thread-again.jpg

Look libtards, the Supreme Court didn't really mean it.

https://x.com/LisaDNews/status/2024916524146757788

wrote:

LIBSHYTS DON"T UNDERSTAND TRUMP'S 42 DIMENSIONAL CHESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
\

datalol.gif