........................................................................
SamplesBoiClips support theory that the girls will willfully involved and consenting.
........................................................................
willing prostitutes
........................................................................
SamplesBoi wrote:
Clips support theory that the girls will willfully involved and consenting.
What a piece of shyt you have to be to make this the hill you die on.
Those 16 year olds WANTED to be with wealthy Jews over 65! I can prove it!
\
........................................................................
PlenisSamplesBoi wrote:
Clips support theory that the girls will willfully involved and consenting.
Minors aren't able to consent to do sex work
and sex work itself is illegal
........................................................................
SamplesBoiPlenis wrote:
and sex work itself is illegal
Well, that took 5 seconds to debunk. The quality of the information here by the libtards is very low.
Not in Netherlands or Epstein Island. 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitut … etherlands
........................................................................
PlenisSamplesBoi wrote:
Well, that took 5 seconds to debunk. The quality of the information here by the libtards is very low.
Not in Netherlands or Epstein Island.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitut … etherlands
Taking underage girls anywhere for sex work is always illegal everywhere.
You must be retarded or have a guilty conscience.
........................................................................
SamplesBoiPlenis wrote:
Taking underage girls anywhere for sex work is always illegal everywhere.
You must be retarded or have a guilty conscience.
That's not what you said, and then you substituted in something else.
HANDGUNS ARE ILLEGAL!
\
Actually, handguns are legal in many nations.
\
NUCLEAR WEAPONS ARE ILLEGAL EVERYWHERE! YOU MUST BE RETARDED!
\
........................................................................
........................................................................
Bagger WiseSamplesBoi wrote:
Clips support theory that the girls will willfully involved and consenting.
1. If they were under the age of consent at the time, it's still a crime.
2. Prostitution is illegal for US citizens.
3. No matter what the people doing this were exploiting the girls and they are scumbags as is anyone supporting them.
........................................................................
Bagger Wise wrote:
the people doing this were exploiting the girls
And the 'girls' who were (and still are) getting paid for it were doing what? Exploiting the wealth of their clients.
You dishonest fags incessantly trying to claim some fictional 'victim' status are far more obscene and disgusting than anything the dirtbag heeb may have done. 
........................................................................
The FBI pored over Jeffrey Epstein’s bank records and emails. It searched his homes. It spent years interviewing his victims and examining his connections to some of the world’s most influential people.
But while investigators collected ample proof that Epstein sexually abused underage girls, they found scant evidence the well-connected financier led a sex trafficking ring serving powerful men, an Associated Press review of internal Justice Department records shows.
Videos and photos seized from Epstein’s homes in New York, Florida and the Virgin Islands didn’t depict victims being abused or implicate anyone else in his crimes, a prosecutor wrote in one 2025 memo.
An examination of Epstein’s financial records, including payments he made to entities linked to influential figures in academia, finance and global diplomacy, found no connection to criminal activity, said another internal memo in 2019.
While one Epstein victim made highly public claims that he “lent her” to his rich friends, agents couldn’t confirm that and found no other victims telling a similar story, the records said.
Summarizing the investigation in an email last July, agents said “four or five” Epstein accusers claimed other men or women had sexually abused them. But, the agents said, there “was not enough evidence to federally charge these individuals, so the cases were referred to local law enforcement.”
The AP and other media organizations are still reviewing millions of pages of documents, many of them previously confidential, that the Justice Department released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act and it is possible those records contain evidence overlooked by investigators.
But the documents, which include police reports, FBI interview notes and prosecutor emails, provide the clearest picture to date of the investigation — and why U.S. authorities ultimately decided to close it without additional charges.
But we know!!!!
\
No, you clearly fuqing don't.
\
........................................................................
Prosecutors fail to find evidence backing most sensational claims
Prosecution memos, case summaries and other documents made public in the department’s latest release of Epstein-related records show that FBI agents and federal prosecutors diligently pursued potential coconspirators. Even seemingly outlandish and incomprehensible claims, called in to tip lines, were examined.
Some allegations couldn’t be verified, investigators wrote.
In 2011 and again in 2019, investigators interviewed Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who in lawsuits and news interviews had accused Epstein of arranging for her to have sexual encounters with numerous men, including Britain’s former Prince Andrew.
Investigators said they confirmed that Giuffre had been sexually abused by Epstein. But other parts of her story were problematic.
Two other Epstein victims who Giuffre had claimed were also “lent out” to powerful men told investigators they had no such experience, prosecutors wrote in a 2019 internal memo.
“No other victim has described being expressly directed by either Maxwell or Epstein to engage in sexual activity with other men,” the memo said.
Giuffre acknowledged writing a partly fictionalized memoir of her time with Epstein containing descriptions of things that didn’t take place. She had also offered shifting accounts in interviews with investigators, they wrote, and had “engaged in a continuous stream of public interviews about her allegations, many of which have included sensationalized if not demonstrably inaccurate characterizations of her experiences.” Those inaccuracies included false accounts of her interactions with the FBI, they said.
Still, U.S. prosecutors attempted to arrange an interview with Andrew, now known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. He refused to make himself available. Giuffre settled a lawsuit with Mountbatten-Windsor in which she had accused him of sexual misconduct.
In a memoir published after she killed herself last year, Giuffre wrote that prosecutors told her they didn’t include her in the case against Maxwell because they didn’t want her allegations to distract the jury. She insisted her accounts of being trafficked to elite men were true.
Prosecutors say photos and videos don’t implicate others
Investigators seized a multitude of videos and photos from Epstein’s electronic devices and homes in New York, Florida and the U.S. Virgin Islands. They found CDs, hard copy photographs and at least one videotape containing nude images of females, some of whom seemed as if they might be minors. One device contained 15 to 20 images depicting commercial child sex abuse material — pictures investigators said Epstein obtained on the internet.
No videos or photos showed Epstein victims being sexually abused, none showed any males with any of the nude females, and none contained evidence implicating anyone other than Epstein and Maxwell, then-Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey wrote in an email for FBI officials last year.
Had they existed, the government “would have pursued any leads they generated,” Comey wrote. “We did not, however, locate any such videos.”
Investigators who scoured Epstein’s bank records found payments to more than 25 women who appeared to be models — but no evidence that he was engaged in prostituting women to other men, prosecutors wrote.
........................................................................
On Dec. 30, 2024, about three weeks before President Joe Biden left office, then-FBI Deputy Director Paul Abbate reached out through subordinates to ask “whether our investigation to date indicates the ‘client list,’ often referred to in the media, does or does not exist,” according to an email summarizing his query.
A day later, an FBI official replied that the case agent had confirmed no client list existed.
........................................................................
Can someone explain to me what the controversy was?
Is it that old men like hot young women? Is that a crime now? I'm confused, because I thought - biologically speaking - all men liked hot young women.
So what exactly was the crime? I mean, I'm no fan of that faggot Bill Gates, but I don't think he should go to jail because he preferred to fuq hot young women over his hag of an old wife
And what does "underage" mean? Underage where? In Europe, where most countries place the age of consent at 14-15? Are all Europeans pedophiles? Or underage in South Korea, where it's 16 - are all South Korean men pedophiles? The age of consent in Russia - the most common nationality for Epstein's whores - is 16.
I don't understand what's happening - it feels like this is all the made-up hysteria of post-menopausal American women who are angry that men no longer look at them.
........................................................................
wrote:
The FBI pored over Jeffrey Epstein’s bank records and emails. It searched his homes. It spent years interviewing his victims and examining his connections to some of the world’s most influential people.
But while investigators collected ample proof that Epstein sexually abused underage girls, they found scant evidence the well-connected financier led a sex trafficking ring serving powerful men, an Associated Press review of internal Justice Department records shows.
Videos and photos seized from Epstein’s homes in New York, Florida and the Virgin Islands didn’t depict victims being abused or implicate anyone else in his crimes, a prosecutor wrote in one 2025 memo.
An examination of Epstein’s financial records, including payments he made to entities linked to influential figures in academia, finance and global diplomacy, found no connection to criminal activity, said another internal memo in 2019.
While one Epstein victim made highly public claims that he “lent her” to his rich friends, agents couldn’t confirm that and found no other victims telling a similar story, the records said.
Summarizing the investigation in an email last July, agents said “four or five” Epstein accusers claimed other men or women had sexually abused them. But, the agents said, there “was not enough evidence to federally charge these individuals, so the cases were referred to local law enforcement.”
The AP and other media organizations are still reviewing millions of pages of documents, many of them previously confidential, that the Justice Department released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act and it is possible those records contain evidence overlooked by investigators.
But the documents, which include police reports, FBI interview notes and prosecutor emails, provide the clearest picture to date of the investigation — and why U.S. authorities ultimately decided to close it without additional charges.
But we know!!!!
\
No, you clearly fuqing don't.
\
But Trump rapes kids because he's mentioned thousands of times in Epstein emails!
\
Except that never happened according to the FBI.
\
........................................................................
Minors cannot consent
........................................................................
wrote:
Minors cannot consent
What is a "minor?"
........................................................................
wrote:
What is a "minor?"

........................................................................
wrote:
What is a "minor?"

........................................................................
wrote:
What is a "minor?"
oh hai Akins
........................................................................
wrote:
oh hai Akins
Not Akins.
I'm asking how you define "minor." There are several dozen definitions from over 200 countries. For example, in Europe, a minor can be anywhere from 13-18. In Asia, the same.
So what's a "minor?" Just provide the definition - I don't understand why it's so difficult for you to do that. You're certain of what a "pedophile" is, so you should be able to tell me what a "minor" is.
........................................................................
SamplesBoi wrote:
Clips support theory that the girls will willfully involved and consenting.
The pedophile protectors have staked out the hill they’ll die on come midterms.
........................................................................
wrote:
The pedophile protectors have staked out the hill they’ll die on come midterms.
According to the FBI findings, it seems like Epstein was the only one who liked young women. You can't protect someone who is dead.
........................................................................
BellaMaxwells lawyer said Trump and Clinton both innocent of any wrong doing.
........................................................................
wrote:
According to the FBI findings, it seems like Epstein was the only one who liked young women. You can't protect someone who is dead.
The list was on her desk, then there was no list.
........................................................................
Previous | First | 1 | 2 | Last | Next