> Disgraced Andrew Makes Royal Demands for Luxurious New Home

Your interest in Pedos is curious.

He deserves it - he did nothing wrong.  The age of consent in the UK is 16.  Is there evidence he had sex with someone under the age of 16?  Then what exactly is he being punished for?  For liking sex with young women?  For sleeping with a prostitute?  Prostitution is legal in the UK.  If the women he had sex with were being forced to sleep with him, that's on their pimp (Epstein), not the john (Andrew). 

The optics of course are bad, and warrants some sort of punishment, but taking his title?  That's insane.

wrote:

He can stay with me at Pedo a Lago.
\

There ought to be a lot of room now.
\

wrote:

I agree with your sentiment but where the law is concerned a girl cannot receive funds for prostitution as a minor in the US. Anyone engaging in paying a minor for sex is breaking the law as is the pimp Epstein.

The reason for this is so minors don't leave home to make a career prostituting themselves. Same thing with OnlyFans.

Point taken - if it happened in the States, it did break the law.  But is there evidence he knew she was a prostitute and under the (US) age of consent?  If so, why hasn't he been prosecuted in the States? 

The whole thing is ridiculous - Epstein was a scum bag pimp, and he's dead.  The whores (that's what they were - whores) sold themselves willingly - there's no evidence he ever physically forced them to do anything.  Preassured?  Sure, but that's not illegal. 

This is just some weird moral panic, driven largely by Epstein's association with Trump.

Women scream at the top of their lungs how empowered they are, how they have agency, but the second they make bad choices, it's someone else's fault. 

Free Andrew!  Free Ghislaine!

wrote:

Point taken - if it happened in the States, it did break the law.  But is there evidence he knew she was a prostitute and under the (US) age of consent?  If so, why hasn't he been prosecuted in the States? 

The whole thing is ridiculous - Epstein was a scum bag pimp, and he's dead.  The whores (that's what they were - whores) sold themselves willingly - there's no evidence he ever physically forced them to do anything.  Preassured?  Sure, but that's not illegal. 

This is just some weird moral panic, driven largely by Epstein's association with Trump.

Women scream at the top of their lungs how empowered they are, how they have agency, but the second they make bad choices, it's someone else's fault. 

Free Andrew!  Free Ghislaine!

I recall in one testimony that a girl was asked if she wanted to go to the island after school. She declined because she said she had soccer practice she didn't want to miss. In other words, no one was being forced to go to the island to make thousands. What's more, one or both of the parents had to know. A minor isn't going to go missing for what would take days without one of the parents knowing.

There is SOME good news for Andrew fans: he is now free to date whomever he likes.

For some reason there is an incel here very concerned about that. 

wrote:

He deserves it - he did nothing wrong.  The age of consent in the UK is 16.  Is there evidence he had sex with someone under the age of 16?  Then what exactly is he being punished for?  For liking sex with young women?  For sleeping with a prostitute?  Prostitution is legal in the UK.  If the women he had sex with were being forced to sleep with him, that's on their pimp (Epstein), not the john (Andrew). 

The optics of course are bad, and warrants some sort of punishment, but taking his title?  That's insane.

It's amazing to watch you defend a man who had sex with children.

Phillip_McCavity wrote:

It's amazing to watch you defend a man who had sex with children.

Define "children."

Phillip_McCavity wrote:

Do you think it is okay for an adult man to have sex with children?

Please explain.

Define 'children'.

wrote:

If anyone should lose their title it's that idiot who sullied the royal line with wog's blood.

Though to be fair he's gpt zero Windsor DNA.

wrote:

I recall in one testimony that a girl was asked if she wanted to go to the island after school. She declined because she said she had soccer practice she didn't want to miss. In other words, no one was being forced to go to the island to make thousands. What's more, one or both of the parents had to know. A minor isn't going to go missing for what would take days without one of the parents knowing.

These 16 yr olds were starstruck, easily impressed, easily flattered by being called beautiful/model material, they worked in the rich people clubs enough to see it was a Kim Kardashian life right under their nose, with yachts & private jets & private islands & mantions beyond fairy tales. Their moms not much better, barely 40 and still chasing hookups and tanning beds with bleached hair & dressing like their teenagers. It is NOT hard at all for the starstruck teens to get away for a day or two just lying saying they have to work & will be staying with Heather overnight.

The moms don’t know/ don’t care/ would jump on the Epstein plane themselves.

Phillip_McCavity wrote:

Do you think it is okay for an adult man to have sex with children?

Please explain.

If you define "children" as someone under the age of 18 then it is still legal in most parts of the world. Men have legally been having sex with and even marrying girls under the age of 18. In fact, as recently as 75 years ago some states allowed a man to marry a girl of 12 years old if he had her parents' permission.