........................................................................
VP_Spiro_T_Cheney wrote:
whoop-dee-do!
the security classification of the documents is still completely irrelevant to the criminal statutes listed on the search warrant.
Tell it to the OP.
........................................................................
VP_Spiro_T_Cheneyfuqing spazzers arguing about something that is completely irrelevant to the charges Trump will be facing
........................................................................
VP_Spiro_T_Cheney wrote:
fuqing spazzers arguing about something that is completely irrelevant to the charges Trump will be facing
What charges is he facing?
Oh that's right. None.
........................................................................
Phillip_McCavityhttps://www.cnn.com/2022/09/22/politics … index.html
Sen. Thom Tillis, a two-term Republican from North Carolina who sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, told CNN that he believes there's a process that must be followed by a President to declassify the records.
"I believe there's a formal process that needs to go through, that needs to be gone through and documented," Tillis said "And to the extent they were declassified, gone through the process, that's fine. ... As I understand the Executive Branch requirements, there is a process that one must go through."
........................................................................
wrote:
And the SCOTUS agrees:
The majority ruling in the 1988 Supreme Court case Department of Navy vs. Egan
"The President, after all, is the 'Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States'" according to Article II of the Constitution, the court's majority wrote. "His authority to classify and control access to information bearing on national security flows primarily from this constitutional investment of power in the President, and exists quite apart from any explicit congressional grant."
----------------------------------------------
In other words: The President makes the rules. Period.
That's not what that says.
........................................................................
JPP.1wrote:
"The President shall be Commander in Chief"
He doesn't report to anyone but himself.
Where does it say he can willy nilly declassify documents?
Did you spend all afternoon looking that up?
........................................................................
JPP.1 wrote:
Where does it say he can willy nilly declassify documents?
Did you spend all afternoon looking that up?
The majority ruling in the 1988 Supreme Court case Department of Navy vs. Egan
"The President, after all, is the 'Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States'" according to Article II of the Constitution, the court's majority wrote. "His authority to classify and control access to information bearing on national security flows primarily from this constitutional investment of power in the President, and exists quite apart from any explicit congressional grant."
........................................................................
JPP.1wrote:
The majority ruling in the 1988 Supreme Court case Department of Navy vs. Egan
"The President, after all, is the 'Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States'" according to Article II of the Constitution, the court's majority wrote. "His authority to classify and control access to information bearing on national security flows primarily from this constitutional investment of power in the President, and exists quite apart from any explicit congressional grant."
:
"The President" He is not the President.
"Classify and control access" Not declassify.
........................................................................
JPP.1wrote:
"The President shall be Commander in Chief"
He doesn't report to anyone but himself.
Quote the Constitution Bitch...
........................................................................
JPP.1 wrote:
"The President" He is not the President.
"Classify and control access" Not declassify. DERP.
Do you think he snuck back into the oval office and got the documents after leaving office?
........................................................................
JPP.1 wrote:
Quote the Constitution Bitch...
"The President shall be Commander in Chief"
That is a direct quote. Section 2.
........................................................................
JPP.1wrote:
Do you think he snuck back into the oval office and got the documents after leaving office?
You know junior... It would not surprise me...
........................................................................
JPP.1wrote:
"The President shall be Commander in Chief"
That is a direct quote. Section 2.
Where in the actual Constitution, as you claimed, does it say he can declassify documents willy nilly...
........................................................................
JPP.1 wrote:
Where in the actual Constitution, as you claimed, does it say he can declassify documents willy nilly...
Ask the SCOTUS. They are the ones that interpreted that as being the Commander In Chief's domain. They even excluded Congress from any say in it.
........................................................................
JPP.1wrote:
Ask the SCOTUS. They are the ones that interpreted that as being the Commander In Chief's domain. They even excluded Congress from any say in it.
No Faggot. Am asking you.
My point was "And who the fuq or what gave him that power"to declassify documents just by thinking about it.
And you said "The Constitution".
Now again asshole, please point in what section of the Constitution does it say he can declassify documents by just thinking about it...
........................................................................
JPP.1 wrote:
No Faggot. Am asking you.
My point was "And who the fuq or what gave him that power"to declassify documents just by thinking about it.
And you said "The Constitution".
Now again asshole, please point in what section of the Constitution does it say he can declassify documents by just thinking about it...
You're asshurt.
........................................................................
JPP.1wrote:
You're asshurt.
Thank you. For proving what an ass you are...
........................................................................
........................................................................
Trump is certifiably insane.
What a whack-a-loon!
........................................................................
wrote:
POTUS can do that anyway he wishes. The Constitution make it is his domain.
NO IT DOES NOT. :LOL:
........................................................................
Tele Syco PathI can “think” women’s pants off.
Then I grab ‘em by the pussy.
\
........................................................................
AusCarFancierwrote:
What he's saying is true. What part is not true?
"There would be a paper trail -- signatures saying the document was declassified, under what law / order, etc. Also, the classification markings would be removed"
He has been called on repeatedly to cite his source for his claims that refute Navy v Egan
........................................................................
AusCarFancierPhillip_McCavity wrote:
Why are you drinking the koolaid on this one?
Trump is simply incorrect, and he was caught red handed with classified materials, which are the property of the US government.
We can argue about whether he should be charged, or if what he did was somehow unintentional, or someone else packed the docs thinking they were okay, etc.
But you cannot deny the fact that these materials were found in his house under his watch.
Sandy Berger was put in prison for taking just one classified document and concealing it, as was David Patreus.
Was Sandy Berger the POTUS or was he given broad powers of declassification by SCOTUS - you dumb fuq paypig?
........................................................................
.,AusCarFancier wrote:
"There would be a paper trail -- signatures saying the document was declassified, under what law / order, etc. Also, the classification markings would be removed"
He has been called on repeatedly to cite his source for his claims that refute Navy v Egan
NO LINK! Reader Beware
........................................................................
wrote:
"The President shall be Commander in Chief"
He doesn't report to anyone but himself.
That says nothing about declassifying documents. What is your point?
........................................................................
Previous | First | 1 | 2 | 3 | Last | Next