> The Republicans rejected a 1/6 bipartisan commission and now they pay the price

They did the right thing and let the dems screw up all by themselves

Remember: there would have been equal R/D, equal staff...the Ds have the Rs all they wanted.

Yet it was still voted down after personal lobbying (probably at Trump's orders).

Now they complain it is one sided.

You voted for it Rs

Phillip_McCavity wrote:

Remember: there would have been equal R/D, equal staff...the Ds have the Rs all they wanted.

Yet it was still voted down after personal lobbying (probably at Trump's orders).

Now they complain it is one sided.

You voted for it Rs

It sure seems to be embarrassing to the liberals, so we have to wonder if that was the intent ....

Phillip_McCavity wrote:

Shows that the President knew the crowd was armed, said "they aren't going to hurt me".

Shows that the President wanted to march or be driven to the capitol and lead the armed mob.


All told by a beautiful 26 year old who heard it all and was disgusted.

All fiction, all lies.   Everyone knows it.

Phillip_McCavity wrote:

Remember: there would have been equal R/D, equal staff...the Ds have the Rs all they wanted.

Yet it was still voted down after personal lobbying (probably at Trump's orders).

Now they complain it is one sided.

You voted for it Rs

What are you smoking?

It is a one sided hearing because Pelosi blocked the Republicans from participating.

I don't see this as harming the republican brand at all.   Isn't a republican running this?  Cheney?

Big Deltree wrote:

No, it was a genius move.

Everyone knows a "select" committee has no legal power. It's just a teleprompter driven show full of liars.

Phil thinks this clown show is going to rule that Trump is not eligible to run for President 

wrote:

Whatever, the dems own the whole rotten mess.

These are Republicans that are testifying.

They are telling what they saw.

Even Ivanka testified that she believed Bill Barr.

wrote:

And some of them are lying

This shyt is going nowhere, get used to that fact.

Why won't Mark Meadows come to the table and take the oath?

And why did he ask for a pardon?

wrote:

Wrong

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/pelos … e-now-what

Jim Jordan coordinated with the White House in the attempts to overturn the election, and asked Trump for a pardon.  Why would you appoint a member of the coup to the investigation and expect them to act in good faith?  Jordan was a sign that McCarthy and the Republicans were not willing to act in good faith.

wrote:

Wrong

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/pelos … e-now-what

This was after the Republicans voted down a true bipartisan investigation.

https://www.npr.org/2021/05/28/10005248 … pitol-riot

Bipartisan legislation to establish an independent commission to investigate the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol has failed in the Senate, as Republicans staged their first filibuster since President Biden took office to block the plan.

The final vote Friday was 54-35, but Republicans withheld the votes necessary to bring the bill up for debate. Just six GOP senators joined with the Democrats, leaving the measure short of the 60 votes needed to proceed.

The proposed commission was modeled on the one established to investigate the 9/11 terror attacks, with 10 commissioners — five Democrats and five Republicans — who would have subpoena powers. A Democratic chair and Republican vice chair would have had to approve all subpoenas with a final report due at the end of the year.