Zewp.com
Zewp.com

> DEA just said that "Marijuana no longer fits two of the three statutory requirements to remain schedule 1"

Previous | First | 1 | 2 | Last | Next

........................................................................

#1 2026-08-26 08:49:05

DEA just said that "Marijuana no longer fits two of the three statutory requirements to remain schedule 1"

I would link but it's all "marijuana daily" type websites and I don't want to visit sites like that.  So you'll have to trust me or google it yourself.

stoner

........................................................................

Terrace
#2 2026-08-26 12:10:19

Re: DEA just said that "Marijuana no longer fits two of the three statutory requirements to remain schedule 1"

wrote:

I would link but it's all "marijuana daily" type websites and I don't want to visit sites like that.  So you'll have to trust me or google it yourself.

stoner

Every state that made it legal saw a big increase in veh accidents

........................................................................

#3 2026-08-26 12:14:02

Re: DEA just said that "Marijuana no longer fits two of the three statutory requirements to remain schedule 1"

Terrace wrote:

Every state that made it legal saw a big increase in veh accidents

link

........................................................................

#4 2026-08-26 12:29:55

Re: DEA just said that "Marijuana no longer fits two of the three statutory requirements to remain schedule 1"

AI Overview                 

Yes, most large-scale data and public health studies indicate that legalizing recreational marijuana is associated with a small but statistically significant increase in vehicle accidents and traffic fatalities. However, the data reveals complex nuances regarding driver behavior and how cannabis compares to other substances

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35838426/

https://www.iihs.org/news/detail/crash- … udies-show

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9318699/

https://www.codot.gov/safety/shift-into … -usa-today

https://www.facs.org/media-center/press … udy-shows/

https://www.jsad.com/do/10.15288/jsad-F … 22-9/full/

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8049641/

https://www.mrblaw.com/study-crash-rate … marijuana/

........................................................................

Oops
#5 2026-08-26 13:04:51

Re: DEA just said that "Marijuana no longer fits two of the three statutory requirements to remain schedule 1"

........................................................................

Terrace
#6 2026-08-26 15:15:37

Re: DEA just said that "Marijuana no longer fits two of the three statutory requirements to remain schedule 1"

wrote:

link

Now what

........................................................................

Spanky
#7 2026-08-26 18:01:22

Re: DEA just said that "Marijuana no longer fits two of the three statutory requirements to remain schedule 1"

Things Are Fine™

........................................................................

#8 2026-08-26 18:27:47

Re: DEA just said that "Marijuana no longer fits two of the three statutory requirements to remain schedule 1"

Those studies cherry pick association and do not discover causality. It's assumption by association by anti marijuana entities like yourself.

google, does not agree, and it;s a typical public woke bot
Research on whether marijuana legalization leads to an increase in traffic accidents or fatalities shows mixed, nuanced conclusions.

The overall impact varies significantly depending on whether the legalization is **medical** or **recreational**, how individual state data is modeled, and how impairment vs. presence of THC is measured.

**Medical Marijuana Legalization**

* **Fatalities Tend to Stay Flat or Decrease:** Most long-term demographic studies find that medical marijuana laws (MMLs) are associated with a slight **decrease or neutral change** in overall traffic fatalities.
* **The Substitution Effect:** Researchers attribute this drop primarily to the "substitution effect"—younger drivers substituting alcohol (which sharply increases risk-taking and crash likelihood) for medical cannabis, leading to fewer alcohol-impaired driving incidents overall.

**Recreational Marijuana Legalization**

* **Slight Increase in Minor/Injury Crashes:** Multi-state studies conducted by organizations like the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) consistently report a modest **5% to 7% increase in total crash rates and injury crashes** after commercial recreational sales begin.
* **Mixed Results on Fatalities:** Results regarding *fatal* crashes are conflicting across different studies:
* *Studies reporting an increase:* Some econometric models (such as studies from the University of Illinois Chicago and the *Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs*) observed a **2% to 10% increase in fatal crashes** in states like Colorado, Oregon, and Washington following retail launch.
* *Studies reporting no significant change:* Papers published in the *American Journal of Public Health* comparing early legal states against synthetic control groups found **no statistically significant change** in post-legalization motor vehicle fatality rates.



**Key Public Health Challenges**

* **Detection vs. Impairment:** Testing positive for THC in a post-crash drug screen indicates *prior use* (within days or weeks), not necessarily *active impairment* at the moment of driving. This distinction makes isolating the exact cause of fatal crashes difficult.
* **Compensatory Driving Behavior:** Driving simulator studies show that cannabis-impaired drivers often attempt to compensate by driving slower and leaving longer follow distances. While reaction times and lane-keeping deteriorate, this slower pace can reduce the severity of impacts—explaining why non-fatal injury crashes tend to rise more noticeably than high-speed fatal crashes.

........................................................................

#9 2026-08-26 20:42:02

Re: DEA just said that "Marijuana no longer fits two of the three statutory requirements to remain schedule 1"

Dope not to good

........................................................................

Phillip_McCavity
#10 2026-08-26 20:47:33

Re: DEA just said that "Marijuana no longer fits two of the three statutory requirements to remain schedule 1"

There has been a large number of ER visits for vomiting (see article) and poisoning, sometimes in children who find gummies.

https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/d … s-syndrome

People who say it isn't as bad as alcohol could be right, but its not perfectly safe.

One thing that seems to be true is that it doesn't have a medical value except in very limited ways. Even though users swear by it to help with sleep, for instance,
most studies suggest it doesn't work.

........................................................................

#11 2026-08-26 20:49:56

Re: DEA just said that "Marijuana no longer fits two of the three statutory requirements to remain schedule 1"

Phillip_McCavity wrote:

One thing that seems to be true is that it doesn't have a medical value except in very limited ways. Even though users swear by it to help with sleep, for instance,
most studies suggest it doesn't work.

Wow, you must have several studies you can link which led you to conclude this, right?

........................................................................

#12 2026-08-26 20:54:41

Re: DEA just said that "Marijuana no longer fits two of the three statutory requirements to remain schedule 1"

wrote:

Wow, you must have several studies you can link which led you to conclude this, right?

It's fuqing Phildo. He just makes shyt up.

Ask him about about RNA coding for protein folding and he'll talk for hours despite all of it being bullshyt.

........................................................................

#13 2026-08-26 20:58:35

Re: DEA just said that "Marijuana no longer fits two of the three statutory requirements to remain schedule 1"

Phillip_McCavity wrote:

There has been a large number of ER visits for vomiting (see article) and poisoning, sometimes in children who find gummies.

https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/d … s-syndrome

People who say it isn't as bad as alcohol could be right, but its not perfectly safe.

One thing that seems to be true is that it doesn't have a medical value except in very limited ways. Even though users swear by it to help with sleep, for instance,
most studies suggest it doesn't work.

Studies based on what? Self-reported use of questionably sourced drugs?

Well that settles it, the weed is no good!
   \
chap2.png

........................................................................

#14 2026-08-26 21:07:54

Re: DEA just said that "Marijuana no longer fits two of the three statutory requirements to remain schedule 1"

wrote:

Dope not to good

It appears you would know. Dope.

........................................................................

Spanky
#15 2026-08-26 21:29:43

Re: DEA just said that "Marijuana no longer fits two of the three statutory requirements to remain schedule 1"

Phillip_McCavity wrote:

There has been a large number of ER visits for vomiting (see article) and poisoning, sometimes in children who find gummies.

https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/d … s-syndrome

People who say it isn't as bad as alcohol could be right, but its not perfectly safe.

One thing that seems to be true is that it doesn't have a medical value except in very limited ways. Even though users swear by it to help with sleep, for instance,
most studies suggest it doesn't work.

All of the above is correct.

FYI - I am not anti-marijuana. But let's be factual about it.

........................................................................

#16 2026-08-26 21:51:03

Re: DEA just said that "Marijuana no longer fits two of the three statutory requirements to remain schedule 1"

Spanky wrote:

All of the above is correct.

No it isn't.  There has been about 2% of the studies needed to establish medical uses.  Yes, it can be dangerous in a number of ways...but you and Phil aren't qualified to close the book on medical use even if you think you are.

........................................................................

#17 2026-08-26 21:57:04

Re: DEA just said that "Marijuana no longer fits two of the three statutory requirements to remain schedule 1"

Spanky wrote:

All of the above is correct.

FYI - I am not anti-marijuana. But let's be factual about it.

I find it odd that the group of people who can't use marijuana are the  ones deciding others shouldn't use it. It has a "If I can't have it, then neither can you" vibe to it all. If you allowed medical people to use marijuana, would their findings change?
Or we should start daily mandatory drug testing for all scientists and medical professionals top to bottom, the entire industry.

Shall we? rofl

........................................................................

#18 2026-08-26 22:00:35

Re: DEA just said that "Marijuana no longer fits two of the three statutory requirements to remain schedule 1"

elon  I've been telling them that for decades...

........................................................................

#19 2026-08-26 22:14:47

Re: DEA just said that "Marijuana no longer fits two of the three statutory requirements to remain schedule 1"

The premise that this is based on is factually wrong in that marijuana is not a single generic substance that is consistent. Until they provide the drug, assure its sole use, and then test results based on that provided drug's use, the science will remain unsettled. In fact, it's important to note potential differences in outcomes between self-acquired and reported use studies and provided and controlled use studies.

I hypothesize that testing of a variety of terpene-prominent strains of the three major varieties of marijuana under controlled conditions will reveal  a great variety of effects and potential medical and refined recreational use.  I also hypothesize that such controlled use studies will reveal a flaw in traditional self-reported use studies in that people get adulterated weed and use other drugs, and that the people being statistically evaluated are predominantly heavy illegal drug users who are interfacing with medical facilities in crisis, and do not represent the vast majority of marijuana users.

Again, ask those who can't use it, due to frequent drug testing, about those who can't handle their lives in general and are facing medical emergencies due to heavy drug use unlikely to be caused by marijuana alone or at all, and you arrive at a fiction based on assumption, that is being projected as being settled science.

You are being propagandized by the big money that doesn't want marijuana to go mainstream more than it has, and is desperate to paint a negative narrative despite 40 million regular users saying, "My experience doesn't match your "facts".

........................................................................

#20 2026-08-26 23:23:15

Re: DEA just said that "Marijuana no longer fits two of the three statutory requirements to remain schedule 1"

Phillip_McCavity wrote:

There has been a large number of ER visits for vomiting (see article) and poisoning, sometimes in children who find gummies.

https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/d … s-syndrome

People who say it isn't as bad as alcohol could be right, but its not perfectly safe.

One thing that seems to be true is that it doesn't have a medical value except in very limited ways. Even though users swear by it to help with sleep, for instance,
most studies suggest it doesn't work.

Just start with Glaucoma, stress and insomnia. For $50 a month instead of $5k like Merck would charge.
Why do you support big pharma?

........................................................................

#21 2026-08-26 23:26:19

Re: DEA just said that "Marijuana no longer fits two of the three statutory requirements to remain schedule 1"

wrote:

Just start with Glaucoma, stress and insomnia. For $50 a month instead of $5k like Merck would charge.
Why do you support big pharma?

I just reviewd some more recent studies, they're now not recommending weed for glaucoma. After all, how will they get appointments and issue prescriptions and charge for drugs if weed works and is cheap?

Think of the industry!

........................................................................

#22 2026-08-26 23:46:13

Re: DEA just said that "Marijuana no longer fits two of the three statutory requirements to remain schedule 1"

True. A couple of Indica hits at night and you'll sleep like a baby

Beats having to take Temazepam and either getting addicted or developing a tolerance

Don't overdo it though..

grin

........................................................................

RockHardConservative
#23 2026-08-27 00:58:49

Re: DEA just said that "Marijuana no longer fits two of the three statutory requirements to remain schedule 1"

weed is for blacks

........................................................................

Sockpuppet
#24 2026-08-27 02:50:22

Re: DEA just said that "Marijuana no longer fits two of the three statutory requirements to remain schedule 1"

wrote:

No it isn't.  There has been about 2% of the studies needed to establish medical uses.  Yes, it can be dangerous in a number of ways...but you and Phil aren't qualified to close the book on medical use even if you think you are.

Nah.

It’s common sense.

No substance exists that cures / treats dozens of conditions.

And marijuana won’t be that either.

I am not anti-marijuana. But we need to be honest about it.

........................................................................

Sockpuppet
#25 2026-08-27 02:52:12

Re: DEA just said that "Marijuana no longer fits two of the three statutory requirements to remain schedule 1"

wrote:

I find it odd that the group of people who can't use marijuana are the  ones deciding others shouldn't use it. It has a "If I can't have it, then neither can you" vibe to it all. If you allowed medical people to use marijuana, would their findings change?
Or we should start daily mandatory drug testing for all scientists and medical professionals top to bottom, the entire industry.

Shall we? rofl

Low IQ response.

........................................................................

Previous | First | 1 | 2 | Last | Next
Share on Facebook . Share on Twitter  . UP . MUP .