> DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

They suffer bruising defeats, then have amnesia and go right back to the flawed hive mind

https://www.democraticunderground.com/1 … 184#post52

CTyankee
Saturday
I know it's early BUT, do you have a suggestion for a Dem woman running for POTUS or VP? If Whitmer runs, she would likely be my first choice. Of those not mentioned in the polls, Chris Murphy has piqued my interest.

Then when they get really disgusted & pouty that a woman won’t win, they get someone like Tim Walz thinking he will draw in Opies.

CTyankee
Yesterday
The GOP will not get another POTUS for a LONG, LONG time!
\
winner

AZJonnie
I was leaning that way too. Two males would be prudent in this election. BUT an ALL FEMALE cabinet!
Saturday
In particular, Attorney General Kamala Harris
\
winner2

Why not a transnig muzzie lezbofag?

Raven123
Klobuchar or Spanberger
Saturday
Or someone like them

Klobuchar has a longer legislative record, and her depth and breadth of experience is valuable. IMO she is excellent in public interviews. She gives well-informed and well formed answers to interviewers’ questions. I read her book Anitrust. It is a bit redundant, but explains the issue clearly.

Spanberger is also well spoken. Answers questions clearly, and concisely. Worked at CIA, which may help facing the disaster emerging under Trump.

I supported and voted for Harris, but I don’t think she is a good extemporaneous speaker, and we need someone who is.
\
winner

flvegan
Sharice Davids.
Saturday
I don't know that much about her, but she's LGBT Native American and literally spent 10 years professionally punching people in the face (former MMA/UFC/whatever competitor).

I don't believe in violence, but I'm pretty sure any debate against Dipshyt Donnie, Vance or whatever vile bag of shyt the R(eally likes pedophiles) party puts up will spend the entire time scared to death that she's going to beat the lies out of him (duh).
\
winner2

DemocracyForever
Jill Stein hurt Hilary and Kamala
58 min ago
Jill Stein is the 21st century's Nader.
\
rant

Manatee
I like
Sunday
Mazie Hirono
\
gayaway

wrote:
Then when they get really disgusted & pouty that a woman won’t win, they get someone like Tim Walz thinking he will draw in Opies.

As the ever witty ShoeOnHead once remarked "he's the first affirmative-action white guy."

wrote:
Klobuchar has a longer legislative record, and her depth and breadth of experience is valuable. IMO she is excellent in public interviews. She gives well-informed and well formed answers to interviewers’ questions. I read her book Anitrust. It is a bit redundant, but explains the issue clearly.

Amy! already ran. She announced in a snowstorm. She went nowhere. Given Somali corruption, she's going nowhere.
\
shatner

wrote:
flvegan
Sharice Davids.
Saturday
I don't know that much about her, but she's LGBT Native American and literally spent 10 years professionally punching people in the face (former MMA/UFC/whatever competitor).

I don't believe in violence, but I'm pretty sure any debate against Dipshyt Donnie, Vance or whatever vile bag of shyt the R(eally likes pedophiles) party puts up will spend the entire time scared to death that she's going to beat the lies out of him (duh).
\

No. I'm here in her district. No.
\
shatner

wrote:
I know it's early BUT, do you have a suggestion for a Dem woman running for POTUS or VP? If Whitmer runs, she would likely be my first choice. Of those not mentioned in the polls, Chris Murphy has piqued my interest.

The ring leader of the Michigan coven? lmao
\
shatner

wrote:
Amy! already ran. She announced in a snowstorm. She went nowhere. Given Somali corruption, she's going nowhere.
\

Failing miserably didn’t stop Kamala

We are a global superpower dealing with some of the most evil regimes ever in human history.

There will be no female military CIC dealing with Muslims.
There will be no female military CIC dealing with Chinese.

wrote:
Failing miserably didn’t stop Kamala

Amy! Is known to be a miserable individual to work for. That will do her in, again.

wrote:
We are a global superpower dealing with some of the most evil regimes ever in human history.

There will be no female military CIC dealing with Muslims.
There will be no female military CIC dealing with Chinese.

Wanna bet?
\
lib

wrote:
Wanna bet?
\

France, Germany, Italy, Australia = You Go Girl. Have the female president or prime minister. Yay girlfriend. You have no military to speak of and the muzzies would sooner use her head for a soccer ball than listen to her speak out loud.

Remember when Hillary was Sec of State, and she went to meet with Putin all puffed up in her pant suit trying to look important?
Putin looked disgusted and bored, Hillary kept cackling away…she presented Putin with a fake red plastic “reset” button to signify they were resetting the countries’ relationship

Putin was facepalm and GTFO

wrote:
Amy! Is known to be a miserable individual to work for. That will do her in, again.

Whereas Trump has a large community of VERY happy and satisfied former employees lol

Not too fond of Trump’s female cabinet picks, or his female SCOTUS pick. The male cabinet - RFK Jr, Hegseth, Rubio, Bessent - tough as nails.
The females are just weak & flaky to be there.

Dotty Dotterson wrote:
Whereas Trump has a large community of VERY happy and satisfied former employees

Remember when nobody voted for Trump & he dropped out?

Jon Stewart AOC ticket. Change it up!

Billionaire owned DNC will never allow AOC to be the nominee

wrote:
AZJonnie

In particular, Attorney General Kamala Harris
\

Kameltoe is a Jim Crow slaver.

lalala Dem Camptown ladies sing dis song, doo da, doo da lalala
\
tyrone

> DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

Re: DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

Re: DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

Re: DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

Re: DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

Re: DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

Re: DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

Re: DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

Re: DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

Re: DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

wrote:

Re: DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

wrote:

Re: DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

wrote:

Re: DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

wrote:

Re: DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

wrote:

Re: DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

Re: DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

wrote:

Re: DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

wrote:

Re: DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

wrote:

Re: DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

Re: DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

wrote:

Re: DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

Re: DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

Dotty Dotterson wrote:

Re: DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

Re: DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

Re: DU learns nothing, decides dems need to run a woman candidate in ‘28. Their favorites are Whitmer, Klobuchar or Spanberger. Although they wouldn’t object to AOC.

wrote: