> Could You Imagine Being So Insane That You Refuse To Install Windows 11 And Instead Use An 11 Year Old OS?

I can't imagine being so lame that you'd actually use windows, unless you're a gamer.

Does windows 11 do something that win 7 x64 doesnt?

As far as I can tell, they both do the same thing but win 7 does it better and faster.

wrote:

Does windows 11 do something that win 7 x64 doesnt?

As far as I can tell, they both do the same thing but win 7 does it better and faster.

Yes, Windows 11 gets updates.

Windows 7 is full of holes.

Spanky wrote:

Yes, Windows 11 gets updates.

Windows 7 is full of holes.

I understand your point.  OTOH how many W7 attacks are still being generated.

Spanky wrote:

Yes, Windows 11 gets updates.

Windows 7 is full of holes.

I havent seen any security holes.

Why would a malware writer target an 11 year old OS that only 13% even use?

Do malware writers still write code to target 1978 Ford pickups too?

wrote:

I can't imagine being so lame that you'd actually use windows, unless you're a gamer.

Spanky is right by staying on Windows.  There's no joy in Linux hardware support.

wrote:

I grudgingly went from 7 to 11 for my main home computer recently. It handles 4k monitors better, but that could have easily been a minor update to 7. 11 also runs some newer shyt that the faggotjeets writing the code won't allow to run on superior systems like 7.

Other than that, 11 has a lot of fuqing spyware to track everything you do and type. It really is fuqing criminal. Op is a deranged psychotic surveillance state advocate.
  \

wrote:

Why do I need a Microsoft Account to install?
Why do I need TPM?
Why does Microsoft keep patching hacks to keep me from installing without a Microsoft account?

1) You don't.

2) Why wouldn't you want a TPM? It makes everything more secure. Why not ask why you can't install it on system with only floppy drives?

3) They don't.

Spanky wrote:

1) You don't.

2) Why wouldn't you want a TPM? It makes everything more secure. Why not ask why you can't install it on system with only floppy drives?

3) They don't.

I'd say you're wrong on 1 & 3.

TPM make is easier to track the sucker, I mean user.

Spanky wrote:

2) Why wouldn't you want a TPM? It makes everything more secure. Why not ask why you can't install it on system with only floppy drives?

Why should I throw out working equipment because Microsoft demands a TPM chip to track me?

Absolutely. Then there are the XP machines I have.
Twice as productive as Win10 (aka Lose10).

Today, Windows is a legacy product.  Maintenance & development have been shipped to the shythole.