> Baggers, so you believe a men can fuq 16 year olds. How about a black guy? Can he fuq a white 16 year old girl?

wrote:

I set a super secret bagger trap.
Lets see what we catch.
   \


AIDS?
   \

I am sorry you have AIDS. Maybe you should stop letting Baggers buttfuq you at the gun range.

wrote:

Darkies are of inferior genetics. They're part monkey. White girls are at the top of the genetics in humans. To have a White girl having a child from a darkie is a crime against nature because it's cheapening her good genetics.

Baggers are of inferior genetics. They're part Neanderthal. All non-bagger girls are at the top of the genetics in humans. To have a non-bagger girl having a child from a bagger is a crime against nature because it's cheapening her good genetics.

give 'er the black snake moan

Spanky wrote:

Baggers are of inferior genetics. They're part Neanderthal. All non-bagger girls are at the top of the genetics in humans. To have a non-bagger girl having a child from a bagger is a crime against nature because it's cheapening her good genetics.

Baggers have non-Bagger daughters. Are you saying genetics change when a Bagger's daughter become a non-Bagger?

wrote:

Not a bagger, but I'd be all for it if there are vids of cute white 16 year girls having massive orgasms from bouncing on the BBC of blacque bucques.

Post regged Heekee.