> They voted for the orange man. Now they are being deported! (reddit)

au3maskrage.jpg



Eatme.jpg

LULZ on fuqing around and finding out.

I have heard dozens of stories over the years of baggers voting for shyt because they thought it was going to apply to other people only to find out that it applies to them and then they get pissed.

One I really remember is a guy in Texas who had supported "tort reform" in order to prevent frivolous lawsuits. His kid, or something, ended up harmed in some big toxic spill or something. He sued. He got $500k, the max legal limit. He was on camera saying he thought tort reform only applied to "frivolous" lawsuits and he didn't think his was.  And it wasn't. But the guy really thought they were going to give the legal limit to frivolous lawsuits and some unlimited amount to "non-frivolous" lawsuits.

People just have to idea how the law works.

wrote:

That's right, bagger. Spanky is on to your bull shyt

Spanky wrote:

The story I mentioned was either on Frontline or 60 Minutes.

well ladeefreekinda for you

They really want to to believe ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS who are not allowed to vote in federal elections somehow voted...

For Trump...

And then want you to believe these Trump voters are now being deported.

This is good stuff  Seriously, keep it up !

anon user #3 wrote:

I( believe the family members remaining ARE citizens and can vote.  So yes I guess not technically the people being deported but their immediate family members.

*Believe*

Some people also *believe*  the Easter Bunny is a real thing

anon user #3 wrote:

https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/1lp3hwt/trump_supporters_being_deported/

So you are admitting that illegals vote illegally?

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/ring-of-fire/
Bias Rating: FAR LEFT (-8.0)
Factual Reporting: MIXED (5.3)
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY

Failed Fact Checks
Overall, we rate The Ring of Fire Network strongly Left biased based on story selection that always favors the left and loaded sensational language that negatively portrays the right. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sourcing techniques, a lack of transparency with ownership, and one-sided propaganda reporting.